PL PACKET 04181995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Regular Meeting Minutes March 28, 1995 • Page 3 1 VI. PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS. 2 . Motion by Enrooth, second by Wagner to approve the following claims: 3 A. North Suburban Cable Commission, in the amount of$9,265.50 for 1995 contribution. 4 B. Midwest Asphalt. Inc., in the amount of$12,585.28 for 1994 Street and Watermain 5 improvements. 6. C. Springsted. Inc.. in the amount of$10,712.16 for services preliminary to the issuance of 7 $825,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1995A. 8 . D. Northwest Banks, in the amount of$1,172.50 for debt service payment for sewer revision 9 October 1, 1988. 10 E. Moody's Investors Service, in the amount of$3,000.00 for professional services rendered 11 for$825,000 General Obligation Bonds. 12 F. Dorsey & Whitney. in the amount of$583.30 for legal services rendered through January 13 31, 1995 regarding Coolidge Residential Lots and $2,929.74 for professional services 14 rendered through January 31, 1995 for general matters. 15 G. Hance, Iverson. Zappia, LeVahn. Berndt. & Desmond. Ltd.. in the amount of$2,400.00, 16 $2,400.00, and $2,400.00 for legal services rendered for the months of January, February, 17 and March of 1995. 18 H. 5 pages of Verified Claims as presented by the Finance Director. Motion carried unanimously., 20 VII. REPORTS. 21 A. Planning Commission-March 21, 1995. 22 1. Myers Tire Supply, 3839 Chandler Drive - Setback Variance Request 23 Commissioner Makowske reported there was one item that required action at the 24 Planning Commission meeting of March 21, 1995. He stated there was a setback 25 variance request made for Myers Tire Supply, 3839 Chandler Drive. He indicated this lot 26 had an unusual shape. He stated the lot was zoned light-industrial and a residential lot 27 abutted the back of the property. He indicated Mr. Dane Teaman had requested the 28 setback variance and had indicated that when he first moved in to the property, there were 29 unclarified notions as to what the fire code required for storage of his products. After he 30 was moved in, the Fire Department informed Mr. Teaman that he was required to have 31 special storage areas for his products. He either would need two foot by three foot rooms 32 with special doors and walls for inside storage or he would need to store the products 33 outdoors. Mr. Teaman then purchased an 8' by 8' storage shed to store the product, and 34 placed it outdoors, next to the loading dock, one foot from the property line. The 35 building inspector then informed Mr. Teaman that the shed was in violation of the 36 setback code, as it had to be placed three feet from the property line. Makowske reported that Management Assistant, Kim Moore-Sykes, had walked the site and reported there was no place the shed could be positioned on the property that would not require a 39 variance. Management Assistant Moore-Sykes recommended approval of the variance 40 request due to the unusual situation, as there was no other place the shed could be located