Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br /> DATE: October 20, 1998 <br /> TO: Planning Commissioners <br /> FROM: Kim Moore-Sykes, Management Assistant <br /> ITEM: 98-10 -- <br /> Mary Silberschmidt, 3125 Roosevelt Street; Sideyard <br /> Variance Request. <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> Ms. Mary Silberschmidt, owner of 3125 Roosevelt Street has submitted a request for a <br /> sideyard setback variance of two feet to allow for the extension of a proposed deck that will <br /> connect with steps that already exist on the south side of her home and make them part of the <br /> proposed deck. Currently, the cement steps are consistently used as egress and ingress from a <br /> door on this side of the house. They extend approximately 5 feet 6 inches from the structure <br /> but are also 3 feet 6 inches into the sideyard setback. The steps are proposed to be renovated <br /> and resituated to face east as part of the proposed deck project. There is a 7-foot sideyard <br /> setback on this side of the house. <br /> Ms. Silberschmidt's home was constructed in 1960, sixteen years before the City's Zoning <br /> Ordinance was adopted. She has indicated to Staff that the steps have not been repaired since <br /> they were constructed and as such are in need of repair: Her house is situated facing west with <br /> her kitchen on the south end and it is from the kitchen that the door-opens onto the steps in <br /> question. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> There are two issues resultant from Ms. Silberschmidt's proposed plan to reconstruct these <br /> steps so that they will be more usable and safer and to connect the steps to the proposed deck <br /> construction:project. The first issue concerns to the reconstruction or repair of a <br /> nonconforming structure. In this situation, the steps currently are partially situated in the <br /> sideyard setback. Section 1660.02, Subdivision L, Existing Structure, of the City Ordinance <br /> states that no'structure used for a nonconforming,use may be enlarged, extended, <br /> reconstructed, replaced or moved except to change it to a conforming use. The steps are <br /> considered an allowed nonconforming structure according to Section 1600.03 because they <br /> were in existence prior to the adoption of the City's Zoning Ordinance. To be in compliance <br /> with the City's.Ordinance, Ms. Silberschmidt has the following options: she can.reconstruct <br /> the steps to descend 2.5 feet from the house within a 2- foot space, which would create a more <br /> dangerous and less accessible exit or entrance to her home; to renovate her kitchen so as to <br /> remove the door, thereby eliminating her ability to exit her home from the south; or not use <br /> the door, again restricting an access or exit'to her home. <br />