My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 02061996
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1996
>
CC PACKET 02061996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:53:55 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:53:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
37
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1997
SP Name
CC PACKET 02061996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Page 3 <br /> 1 VIII. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH COMMENTS ON ST. ANTHONY'S WATER <br /> 2 SUPPLY. <br /> 3 Larry Hamer, Public Works Director reported to the City Council that a water <br /> 4 conservation plan and an emergency potable water plan had been submitted to the <br /> 5 State for review and comment. He also indicated that he had asked Bruce Olson <br /> 6 from the Department of Health to report to the Council on the City's water <br /> 7 situation. <br /> 8 Mr. Hamer continued to report that the submitted plan was returned to the City by <br /> 9 the Department of Natural Resources for additional information as it was <br /> 10 determined that the City's report did not contain enough information. When Mr. <br /> 11 Hamer spoke to Mr. James Japp, it became clear that the City's report had not been <br /> 12 read. The main issue that Mr. Japp maintained that the plan did not address was <br /> 13 that the City had no fee structure to penalize water users who did not conserve <br /> 14 water. Mr. Hamer reported that he informed Mr. Japp that the City Council was <br /> 15 not in favor of imposing financial penalties on water users, but rather provided <br /> 16 information and education through various sources about the conservation of water. <br /> 17 Mr. Japp indicated that as the result of their conversation, he would consider St. <br /> 18 Anthony's water plan adequate. <br /> 09 Mr. Olson was introduced and reported to the City Council on the wellhead <br /> 20 protection plan. He indicated that the wellhead protection plan was intended to <br /> 21 protect users of water in communities of 25 or more water users. Mr. Olson said <br /> 22 that his department looks at areas that supply water and assess the contamination of <br /> 0 <br /> 23 wells or the vulnerability of wells to potential contamination sources. Mr. Olson <br /> 24 indicated that the Plan allows a community two (2) years to develop a wellhead <br /> 25 protection plan. It was his opinion that St. Anthony may be granted an extension <br /> 26 due to the fact that the City has many wells and two (2) counties are involved. <br /> 27 In July, 1996, the City will receive a letter from his department stating what will be <br /> 28 needed to put a plan together. St. Anthony will have another year from that date <br /> 29 to begin working on the City's plan. Mr. Olson indicated that there are funds <br /> 30 available to help pay for the designation of the 'capture zones' around the wells in <br /> 31 St. Anthony. <br /> 32 Mr. Olson reported that the major source of contamination were old domestic wells <br /> 33 that haven't been properly sealed. He indicated that residents may be eligible for <br /> 34 county funds available for capping old wells. He also reported that the Soil & <br /> 35 Water Conservation District for Hennepin and Ramsey Counties is another <br /> 36 potential source of funds for this purpose. <br /> 107 Mr. Olson indicated that much of the work for the City's wellhead protection plan <br /> 8 could be provided by resident advisory committees or task forces. It had been his <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.