Laserfiche WebLink
. . . . <br /> 1 The Finance Director reported in answer to Councilmember Cavanaugh, that non-operating <br /> 2 revenues do not subsidize water and sewer rates. He indicated that he will recommend to the <br /> 3 auditor that his report be clearer on this issue. Councilmember Cavanaugh disagreed stating <br /> 4 that the sewer fund is loosing $107,000, that the audit sheet does not report this fact clearly. ' <br /> 5 Mayor Ranallo asked if Councilmember Cavanaugh feels the audit report is not correct. <br /> 6 Councilmember Cavanaugh stated that it is correct, but it is not stated like other professional <br /> 7 audits. Mayor Ranallo responded that if the sewer fund is in deficit of$100,000, than the City <br /> 8 will need to raise sewer rates. Council directed the Finance Director to review rates and <br /> 9 report to the Council in February. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 VI. DISCUSSION OF WATER FILTRATION FUNDS. <br /> 12 The Finance Director reported on the annual review of water filtration funds. He indicated <br /> 13 that the City is in its eighth year of its 10-year agreement with the MPCA. He reported that <br /> 14 upon completion of this agreement, the City will be totally responsible for the maintenance of <br /> 15 the water filtration facility. The Finance Director reviewed the history of these funds. He <br /> 16 stated that in 1990, the Council implemented a financial plan to build funds sufficient enough <br /> 17 to provide annual interest earnings adequate to provide funding for the water filtration facility <br /> 18 and building capital improvements without reducing the principal. The Finance Director <br /> 19 reported that the present financial plan in place is accomplishing that. He also reported that in <br /> 20 recent discussions with the MPCA, they indicated that the projected life to clean up the water <br /> 21 could take as long as 100 years. He recommended to Council that they designate interest <br /> 22 earnings, which exceed the funds needed to cover the current operation and maintenance costs, <br /> 23 into a building replacement improvement fund, minimizing the tax impact on the residents <br /> 24 when the facility may need to be replaced. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Councilmember Cavanaugh disagreed with the Finance Director's recommendation. He <br /> 27 indicated that the $4.8 million is a reward to the citizens for drinking rotten water. He <br /> 28 indicated that it is his suggestion to put this money into a financial plan that would allow for its <br /> 29 best use now throughout the community. He stated that he will not be around in 30 - 40 years <br /> 30 when the facility may or may not need reconstruction. There was Council discussion <br /> 31 regarding the appropriate use of this money. The Council was of the opinion that the money <br /> 32 should stay in the water filtration fund to insure that future generations will not be exposed to <br /> 33 large financial outlays associated with water treatment. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 VII. REVIEW OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES FOR 1998 GENERAL <br /> 36 FUND. <br /> 37 The City Manager reported that this was an item brought back from the October 6, 1998 <br /> 38 Council worksession meeting and the summary provided in tonight's meeting packet is a <br /> 39 projection of revenues over expenses. He indicated that the proposed 1999 budget shows an <br /> 40 estimated surplus of$180,984.00. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Councilmember Cavanaugh suggested that there are discrepancies between the 1997 budget and <br /> 43 the estimated 1998 budget. Because the Council did not have the 1997 budget to review, there <br /> 44 was no discussion. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 VIII. REVIEW ORDINANCE ON POLITICAL SIGNS. <br /> 2 <br />