CC MINUTES 04261966 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

f( •r -� COUNCIL MINUTES April 26, 1966 The regular meeting of the Village Council of St. Anthony was called to order by the Mayor at 8x00 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday April 26, 1966. The following were present at roll calls Curtis O'Connor, W. R. Dougherty, Clem Springer, Robert Bailey, Richard Sorenson. also presents Village Attorney, Raymond Haik Village Manager, John Printon Upon motion by Councilman Bailey, and seconded by Councilman Sorenson it was moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of April 12, 1966 be approved as submitted. Motion Carried, Mr. Mesenbring presented the minutes of the Planning Board meeting of April 19, 1966. • Frank Fudali, Attorney, represented Mrs. Ammerman, property owner at 3309 Stinson Boulevard. Mr. Fudali stated that he felt the minutes of the Planning Board meeting of April 19, 1966 did not fully outline the important parts of his arguement for his client. He stated the petition referred to in the Planning Board Minutes of April 19-, 1966 as claimed, was shown or displayed to the members of the Board and is available for examination. He pointed out that the other corners were occupied by commercial enterprises, and that he had found the zoning of the Minneapolis corner properties to be BS-2. This consisting of two lots on each corner. He sited a case that held that zoning adjacent to, and outside a municipality must be considered in the zoning of a municipality. He requested the Council to hear the arguments at this time instead of waiting for the Planning Board meeting of May 17, 1966, and that the Council directive to the Planning Board regarding the consideration of the change in zoning be rescinded. Mr. Howitz, Planning Board member and Chairman, stated that N.S.P. Company had stated that the removal of the transformer station had been estimated at between the fall of 1966 or the fall of 1967. Mayor O'Connor explained that the consid- eration of the zoning change was made after an indication by N.S.P. Company that the transformer would be removed. Councilman Springer stated that he felt the Council wanted the remaining property to be considered in the zoning change in addition to the N.S.F. Company property and that the reason for holding the remaining property commercial in the previous zoning change of adjacent property was because of the presence of the transformer on the N.S.P. Company property. Councilman Bailey stated that the removal of the N.S.P. Company transformer was the main reason for the zoning change proposal and that the whole area was inclu- ded in the directive to the Planning Board.