Laserfiche WebLink
r -2- <br /> Councilman Haik wanted Mr. Dulgar to explore the possibility of installation of <br /> • a 4-way stop at the intersection of Silver Lane and Silver Lake Road in the in- <br /> terim before the actual placing of a traffic signal at that point. It was also <br /> felt that the Manager should contact New Brighton regarding the project. <br /> Motion by Councilman Haik, seconded by Councilman Sundland to direct the Manager <br /> to correspond further with Ramsey County acknowledging the information they have <br /> supplied regarding their plans to widen Silver Lake Road and suggesting the <br /> installation of a 4-way stop at Silver Lane and Silver Lake Road in the interim <br /> before the traffic signal planned for the spot is put in and also to request <br /> enough further data regarding construction dates and final plans for the project <br /> to enable the Council to set a date for a public hearing. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Mr. Fran Schuck of Constructive Design arrived at 8:48 P.M. and presented the <br /> tabulated bids for the bar equipment and furniture for the liquor lounge. He <br /> agreed with Mr. Dulgar's recommendation that more competitive bids be taken before <br /> the contracts are awarded and suggested that the bids might be taken on an <br /> individual basis for all the items possible. <br /> Motion by Councilman Stauffer, seconded by Councilman Sundland to accept the bids <br /> but to table action on awarding the contracts in order that a further evaluation <br /> can be made of each item contained in the bids for the bar equipment and furniture <br /> for the liquor lounge. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> • The meeting was recessed at 8:50 P.M. and reconvened at 9:07 for the discussion <br /> of the Street Improvement Project and the results of the public hearing on the <br /> project which had been held March 28, 1974. <br /> A large group of residents indicating an interest in the discussion were present <br /> and Mayor Miedtke explained that in order that a logical evaluation could be <br /> made of the information to be given to the Council, all discussions of the data <br /> would be limited to the Council, Manager and Engineer. He assured them that no <br /> decision on the project would be made that evening. <br /> There followed a discussion of what constituted a typical residential street in <br /> St. Anthony for the purpose of establishing assessment costs and what were the <br /> possibilities of the State accepting deviations of the standards set whereby <br /> Minnesota State Aid is granted. <br /> Mr. Comstock detailed the process to be followed to request the State to allow <br /> such deviations. He told the Council that although the state standards for state <br /> aid streets were flexible since they are set by a committee of representatives of <br /> all the municipalities, the standard width for such streets as set for years has <br /> been 44 feet. He thought a rejection of their request might be given sooner than <br /> approval since that might require a submission of the request to a Board of Review. <br /> He said the state aid funds may be used anywhere the municipality has an obligati- <br /> on and pointed out that the rules and regulations regarding traffic restrictions <br /> are also drawn up by representatives of the different municipalities of the State. <br /> • It is possible to obtain state aid for streets as narrow as 36 feet if parking is <br /> restricted on one side of the street and plans for a walkway for the other side <br /> are submitted with the request for such funds, the Engineer said, and he also <br /> explained that Minnesota State Aid is based on per capita and need (miles of <br /> streets) of a municipality. He further said State Aid for maintenance funds are <br /> not as closely restricted as for construction funds. <br />