My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 06041974
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1974
>
CC MINUTES 06041974
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:14:23 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:14:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
35
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1974
SP Name
CC MINUTES 06041974
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-3- <br /> The traffic counts made each year since 1961 on 29th Avenue were the basis for <br /> y the recommendation for a 9 ton road. Mr. Comstock said, and the only east-west <br /> • street in St. Anthony which exceeded the traffic count on 29th was 37th Avenue <br /> N.E. where the traffic flow was almost double. <br /> Mr. Dulgar reported that his contacts with the State regarding the possibility <br /> of restricting truck traffic on a state aid street indicated that the municipalit- <br /> ies who put up "No Trucks" signs on such streets were "flirting with a court case". <br /> Councilman Sundland questioned whether any action was feasible before the Engineer <br /> had an opportunity to investigate the alternatives with the State. <br /> Mayor Miedtke pointed out the urgency of some repair work and said if the road had <br /> to be continuously repaired it seemed logical to him to bring the total street up <br /> to good quality at the same time. <br /> When Councilman Sundland asked what the potential life of the street would be if <br /> the trouble spots were dug out and a seal coat put on the whole street, Mr. Dulgar <br /> advised him that the last seal coat was placed on 29th in 197 . <br /> Mayor Miedtke wanted the Engineer to be directed to negotiate with the State for <br /> a 39 foot street using the argument that such a street would be less expensive <br /> and yet that width would not place a restriction on traffic. He expressed a <br /> reluctance to restrict parking on 29th because of the possibility of limiting <br /> the parking space for Silver Point Park and was concerned about where traffic <br /> would be diverted if 29th were no longer a major thoroughfare. <br /> In reply to a question from Councilman Stauffer, Mr. Dulgar said about $5,000 <br /> per mile is budgeted each year for maintenance costs which include plowing, <br /> salaries and pensions, signs, etc. He said Councilman Sauer had asked him if <br /> the state funds could be obtained for the construction if the work were done by <br /> the St. Anthony Maintenance Department and he replied because they could not work <br /> on the project exclusively, even though the state would allow the department to <br /> do the job, it might take at least six months longer to complete the job and <br /> would result in the street being torn up for a longer time. <br /> He also answered Councilman's Stauffer's question of whether a street improvement <br /> fund could be built up to cover future improvements throughout the municipality <br /> by saying that, under levy restrictions , there were only enough funds to cover <br /> work actually needed to be done and funds could not be levied in addition to <br /> cover potential improvements. <br /> Councilman Sauer arrived at 9:45 P.M. <br /> In the discussion of what the actual assessment figures per front foot would be <br /> made to residents of 29th Avenue, the Engineer told the group that, with no state <br /> aid, the recommended 9 ton, 40 foot wide road with the necessary 600 feet dug up <br /> and 1,200 feet of gutters replaced, would cost each resident $40 per front foot. <br /> If the $140,000 which St. Anthony has in its state aid conbtruction fund were <br /> applied to the $271,000 improvement it would reduce those costs to residents of <br /> 29th. <br /> The Council then pursued the possibility of assessing all residents on 29th at a <br /> • rate of $23.70 per front foot, the amount considered as typical front foot <br /> assessment for residents on an average street and then having the $17.00 per <br /> front foot which remained either picked up by assessing the residents on the <br /> adjacent streets to 29th Avenue or the community as a whole. The prospects of <br /> crediting the home owners with $8.00 for curb and gutters which did not need <br /> replacing was also discussed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.