Laserfiche WebLink
v � <br /> 2 <br /> IN EXPLAINING THE DROC14URE FROM THE HERFURTH COMPANY, MRS. BROWN TOLD THE BOARD <br /> OF HER CONTACT WITH MORE THAN 30 HOMEOWNERS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND EFFORTS TO <br /> • REACH THE REST BY CORRESPONDENCE TO OBTAIN THEIR OPINIONS ON THE PROPOSAL. MRS. <br /> BROWN REPORTED ONLY TWO OF THE NEIGHBORS HAD VOICED OBJECTIONS TO THE USE OF THE <br /> PROPERTY FOR A REAL ESTATE OFFICE. MR. HOLIEN, THE FORMER OWNER OF THE PROPERTY <br /> SAID THE PLANS WERE FAVORABLE TO HIM AS THE POTENTIAL RESIDENT OF THE ADJACENT LOT. <br /> THE BOARD INDICATED THEIR DISAPPROVAL OF THE SIZE OF THE IDENTIFYING SIGN PROPOSED <br /> FOR THE REAL ESTATE OFFICE AND MR. LEKSON WAS DIRECTED TO SUPPLY MRS. BROWN WITH <br /> THE SIGN ORDINANCE GOVERNING ANY SIGN PLACED ON THE PROPERTY. <br /> MOTION BY MR6':THOMPSON AND SECONDED BY MR. CARLSON TO INDICATE TO THE COUNCIL THE <br /> BOARD'S APPROVAL OF THE HERFURTH REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ONLY FOR A <br /> REAL ESTATE OFFICE ON THE W. 186 FT. OF LOT 9, BLOCK 6, MOUNDSVIEW, 2ND ADDN. <br /> ___-M TION CARRIED. <br /> MR. HENRY MURLOWSKI , CONTRACTOR, PRESENTED HIS PLANS FOR THE 50 X 100 FT. ADDITION <br /> HE PROPOSED TO BUILD ON THE REAR OF THE ARO INDUSTRIES STRUCTURE AT 3615 -29TH <br /> AVENUE N. E. <br /> MOTION BY MR. KRONK AND SECONDED BY MR. PETERSON TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE RE- <br /> QUEST FOR A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE ADDITION TO ARO INDUSTRIES AS PROPOSED. <br /> MOTION BY MR. JOHNSON AND SECONDED BY MR. THOMPSON THAT THE ABOVE MOTION BE AMENDED <br /> TO STIPULATE THAT ALL PLANS F3R THE ADDITION BE REVIEWED AND APPROV9D BY THE FIRE <br /> MARSHALL AND MEET ANY APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES. <br /> MOTION ON THE AMENDMENT CARRIED. <br /> • <br /> '-"ORIGINAL MOTION CARRIED. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> MOTION BY MR. KRONK AND SECONDED BY MR. THOMPSON TO APPOINT MRS. GRACE MCGINN AS <br /> CHAIRMAN AND MR. RICHARD LETOURNEAU AS VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE ST. ANTHONY PLANNING <br /> BOARD FOR 1974. <br /> MOTION CARRIED. <br /> DURING A DISCUSSION OF THE WETLANDS ORDINANCE SOME MEMBERS OF THE BOARD EXPRESSED <br /> AN OPINION THAT PASSING THE ORDINANCE WOULD SERVE AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL TOWARDS <br /> OBTAINING COOPERATION IN PRESERVING THE WETLANDS OF THE COMMUNITY. MR. CARLSON <br /> MADE THE POINT THAT MEASURES TO PRESERVE THE ECOLOGY OF A REGION ULTIMATELY ADD <br /> TO INFLATION AND RESULT IN COST TO THE TAXYPAYER. <br /> MOTION BY MR. JOHNSON AND SECONDED BY MR. KRONK THAT THE BOARD RECOMMEND THE ADOP- <br /> TION OF WETLAND ORDINANCE ## 1973-003 WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS: <br /> 1 ) THE ORDINANCE BE APPLICABLE TO THE ENTIRE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY. <br /> 2) THE WORD "SUBDIVISION" BE ELIMINATED FROM THE WORDING OF SECTION 5 OF <br /> THE ORDINANCE. <br /> • MOT16N CARRIED. <br /> �l <br />