My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 06171975
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Agendas
>
2014
>
1975
>
PL MINUTES 06171975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:38:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 5:38:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
36
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1975
SP Name
PL MINUTES 06171975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> June 17, 1975 <br /> • The meeting was called to order by Chairman Letourneau at 7:32 P. M. <br /> The following were present for roll call: Johnson, Hiebel-, Marks Letourneau <br /> and Cowan. <br /> Absent: Bowerman and Rymarchick <br /> Also present: Harry Lekson <br /> The following amendment was made to the minutes of the May 20, 1-975 Planning <br /> Board meeting: <br /> Page 2 - para 1: Strike "for a public hearing". <br /> Motioned by Mr. Marks and seconded by Mr. Cowan to approve the minutes of the <br /> May 20 meeting as amended. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> and Mrs. William R. Olson,-4220 Valley View Road,' owners of the Metropolitan <br /> Flea Market, 2500 - 38th Avenue N.E. , appeared to request additional_ signage for <br /> identification of their building in which they expect to have shops for approx- <br /> imately 350 dealers. <br /> • They explained that the flea market had been originally identified as such on <br /> the existing sign on the top of the building but this sign was painted out, when <br /> they were informed by the City that they had exceeded the 180 sq. ft. of signage <br /> a' '_owed by the present sign ordinance. This allowed them to use onty 90 sq'. ft. <br /> of the 300 sq. ft. sign on the east- and the 90 sq. ft. sign on the west sides of t_- <br /> the building, with no signs on either the north or south sides. <br /> This action resu-1_ted,- they said, in potential_ customers complaining of the diff- <br /> iculty in locating the building and caused many persons to believe they were <br /> going out of business. The signs already on the building when the Oison's leased <br /> it were those of the former tenantPl-aywor,_d and had been placed ther prior to the <br /> establishment of the present sign ordinance, During the discussion it was estab- <br /> Ushed that it would be virtual-1_y-impossible to remove the large sign on the top <br /> of the building. Mr. Olson showed photos of the building which he felt illustrat- <br /> ed the difficulty drivers on Silver Lake Road would have identifying the business <br /> in its present "landlocked" location on a road which is only partially a city <br /> street. <br /> Mr. 01son identified the dealers who use this building as "first class Business" <br /> and rated the flea market as classifying just below a "discount store" and said <br /> he felt that the number of dealers and size of the building which was 100,000 <br /> sq. ft. should justify the building being allowed a percentage of the amount of <br /> signage as would normally be permitted a shopping center of the same size. <br /> In the discussion which preceded the voting on the proposal Mr. Marks said that <br /> • although he preferred the single identification of the building to the possible <br /> listing of all the dealers in the building, he had "great difficulty with the <br /> size of the sign on top of the building. <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.