Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br /> The Manager wanted the responsibility of the safety of pedestrians <br /> • left to the bank and Hennepin County , which controls Kenzie Terrace. <br /> He said the logical point for pedestrian crossing would be at the <br /> intersection of Stinson Boulevard and Lowry Avenue where there will <br /> be a semaphor installed this summer. Whether a curb cut can be made <br /> on Kenzie Terrace will also be left to the county and he doubted <br /> whether they would allow a mid-block crosswalk in view of the hazards <br /> pedestrians are exposed to in the cross walk a few blocks down <br /> Kenzie Terrace. <br /> Mr. Bjorklund agreed with Mr. Jones that there was not adequate <br /> buffering of the site in the plan between the residences across the <br /> street and the building east of the proposed lot. He thought at <br /> least three parking stalls, rather than one suggested by Mr . Johnson, <br /> should be reserved for snow storage and felt since a precedent had <br /> been set in many cases throughout the City for allowing nine rather <br /> than ten foot wide parking spaces , this route might be taken to maxi- <br /> mize the use of the lot, but thought the parking bumpers were planned <br /> too close to the lot line . He offered amendments to the following <br /> motion which reflected these changes . <br /> Motion by Mr. Rymarchick and seconded by Mr. Klick to recommend <br /> Council approval of setback variances of two feet on the east side , <br /> four feet on the Kenzie Terrace side, and seven feet on the Lowry <br /> side of Lot 1 , Block 1, Kenzie Terrace Addition (approximately 2510 <br /> Kenzie Terrace N.E. ) , which will permit parking for the St. Anthony <br /> National Bank, as proposed within the setbacks , finding that : <br /> • 1) because of the unique shape of the property, it probably would be <br /> a problem to develop any other commercial use, especially considering <br /> the associated parking requirements; 2) no apparent desire is demon- <br /> strated, through these variances , to increase the value , but rather <br /> just to maximize the use of this odd-shaped lot; and 3) strict ad- <br /> herance to City ordinance would hinder the maximum use of the pro- <br /> perty for a parking facility by limiting the number of automobiles <br /> and making the use unreasonable. Recommendation of approval is made <br /> contingent upon thc. owner being responsible : to either provide ade- <br /> quate snow storage on the property or to have it hauled away; to pro- <br /> vide density of planting and screening along the Lowry Avenue side <br /> to an opaque or near opaque visability, and to a height of no less <br /> than four feet; parking bumpers are to be positioned at least six <br /> feet from the lot line in all cases ; and the owners are urged to <br /> encourage their employees to cross at the appropriate locations ; and <br /> the owners are to follow their planting proposals as presented. <br /> ,Motion carried unanimously. <br /> At 8 : 50 p.m. Chairman Marks opened the Public Hearing on the request <br /> from Mr. and Mrs . Leonard Toth for a four foot side yard setback <br /> variance to the City Zoning Ordinance which will allow them to com- <br /> plete the existing porch and add a vestibule on their home at 2900 <br /> Roosevelt Street N.E. <br /> • c <br /> I <br />