Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> May 17, 2005 <br /> Page 9 <br /> 1 to bring this into conformity with the current zoning, to be able to provide the framework and to <br /> 2 have the issues addressed through the conditional use process. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Chair Stromgren asked how long the Alderwoods Group has been in operation. Mr. Tyson stated <br /> 5 that the Alderwoods Group has been in operation since 1991. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Chair Stromgren closed the Public Hearing at 8:22 p.m. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Commissioner Jensen stated that the City has no ability to demand that a facility maintain upkeep <br /> 10 of conforming use. Ms. Moore-Sykes clarified that as a legal non-conforming they cannot allow <br /> 11 anything to happen there that would continue to be non-conforming. She explained that the <br /> 12 zoning ordinance stated that a City has the right to go in and rectify violations of the code that <br /> 13 create a nuisance. She stated that the City does have the ability to control what goes into an area <br /> 14 through the zoning and ordinance. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Commissioner Jensen acknowledged that it is the site that moves so many of the residents,which <br /> 17 is the reason why they should add a conditional use. He noted that there are many places in the <br /> 18 cemetery where trees are missing and nothing has been replanted. He stated that the site was <br /> 19 significant for what it was designed to be and clearly, at some point, it should be expected that <br /> 20 there would be some form of construction activity as the roads are in need of repair. He agreed <br /> 21 that there are a lot of reasons for concern when considering the upkeep adding that he does not <br /> 22 know if anything has actually been submitted at this point that would allow him to vote on the <br /> 23 building design or the text amendment. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Commissioner Young expressed concerns stating that they have funeral homes and mortuaries in <br /> 26 commercial use areas and now they are discussing the possibility of moving this to another <br /> 27 zoning code group. She stated that she is concerned and unsure as to how this bodes for the City. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Vice Chair Hason stated that after talking with Residents he does not think that a funeral home <br /> 30 should be permitted in an R-1 zoning. He stated that he would be interested to know if the <br /> 31 Alderwoods Group has looked at redesigning or reconfiguring the Minneapolis portion of the <br /> 32 cemetery. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Chair Stromgren stated that he and Commissioner Young participated with the Design <br /> 35 Committee and shared several design alternatives that included remodeling and expansion of the <br /> 36 chapel building located at the west end of the Mall on the Minneapolis side. He stated that the <br /> 37 options proved to be unworkable because they did not have an adequate space at the site. He <br /> 38 stated that they took it away from the meeting that they could do a workable solution that would <br /> 39 require a split in the operations between sales and administration and the funeral home could fit <br /> 40 on the chapel site, which would allow the original administration building to retain its original <br /> 41 footprint. He noted that the entire landscape composition was clearly eligible to be nominated <br /> 42 for historical designation. He stated that he has copies of two letters submitted to Staff, one from <br /> 43 Joan Scovil opposing the changes and the other from Chris Addington and Delores Way both <br /> 44 oppose the plan. <br /> 45 <br />