Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> May 17, 2005 <br /> Page 10 <br /> 1 Commissioner Jensen noted that the administration building function would be part of the <br /> 2 definition proposal and asked if this is something that should be within a motion or as Item E in <br /> 3 the document. He stated that currently it is not listed as a function and he wants to make the <br /> 4 functions compliant. Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that currently it exists as a legal non-compliant <br /> 5 that cannot be expanded or enhanced. She stated that the entire site exists in an R-1 zone adding <br /> 6 that she is not sure where the light industrial reference comes from. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Commissioner Galyon clarified that this would be the first allowed as a commercial use in an R-1 <br /> 9 District. Chair Stromgren confirmed. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Motion by Commissioner Jensen to recommend approval of the text amendment as indicated and <br /> 12 summarized by Staff, that the text amendment would be under 1605.1 definitions and included as <br /> 13 Item E-cemeteries under permitted conditional uses within an R-1 District; provide that the site is <br /> 14 at least 10-acres in size; allow mausoleums; and add Item D-funeral homes, mortuaries and <br /> 15 crematoriums to the zoning ordinance. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Motion by Vice Chair Hanson, second by Commissioner Young, to deny the text change <br /> 20 amendment as defined in 1605.01, .02 and .03 as recommended by the Alderwoods Group. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Ayes-6 Nays-1 (Jensen) Motion carried. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 7.3 AMCON St. Anthony, LLC— St. Anthony Marketplace <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that Staff is asking the Planning Commission to review the proposed <br /> 27 revised site plan and consider the various petition requests presented by the representatives of <br /> 28 AMCON. She provided the Commission with an overview of each request noting that each has <br /> 29 been published in the local newspaper and neighboring properties have been notified. She stated <br /> 30 that AMCON representatives have met with Staff to review their revised site plan for the <br /> 31 remaining development of the former Stonehouse property. She provided the Commission with <br /> 32 an overview of the conditions noting that the hours for outdoor seating should not exceed beyond <br /> 33 10:00 p.m. She stated that City Engineers must approve the plan and determine whether there <br /> 34 would be any adverse affects on the current water flow. She stated that the hours of operation <br /> 35 would coincide with the liquor store noting that the conditional use permit previously approved <br /> 36 has expired and the conditions no longer pertain. She stated that based on the findings of facts <br /> 37 from the public hearing on each of the requests, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission <br /> 38 consider recommending approval of the revised site plan, conditional use permits and variances <br /> 39 to City Council. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Paul Tucci, Oppidan, Inc., provided the Planning Commission with an update on the proposed <br /> 42 site plan. He reviewed the major modification of the building noting that they are proposing <br /> 43 4,500-feet as compared to the original intention to place a 6,000 square foot restaurant. He stated <br /> 44 that things have changed and they have been trying to fill the space. He indicated that they do <br /> 45 have an operator who wants 3,500 square feet and this would allow them the best opportunity to <br />