Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> July 19, 2005 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 1 noted that Prom Catering is the currently the contracted caterer for the facility and would remain <br /> 2 for outside events. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Commissioner Young asked what the hours of operation would be for the facility. Mr. Reiners <br /> 5 stated that specific operating hours for the facility have not been determined yet. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Commissioner Young clarified that there is no liquor license for the premise. Ms. Moore-Sykes <br /> 8 confirmed stating that Prom Catering would carry the liquor license and would be responsible for <br /> 9 carding and ensuring that the facility remains in compliance with all liquor laws. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 8.2 3645 Chelmsford Road NE—R1 to R2 Rezoning Request <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that Staff is asking the Planning Commission to review a request by <br /> 14 Troy Martenson, owner of 3645 Chelmsford Road to rezone from an R1 Single-Family to an R2 <br /> 15 Two-Family Zoning District. She stated that currently the property is zoned Rl, has an existing <br /> 16 single-family structure on the lot and is a corner lot. She stated that the lot is 19,260-square feet <br /> 17 with a 75-foot utility easement given to Xcel Energy and is across the northern portion of the lot. <br /> 18 She stated that the property adjacent to the east is zoned R2; the properties directly across 37th <br /> 19 Avenue to the north are zoned R4. She indicated that there have been several attempts to split <br /> 20 this lot but because of the utility easement, these attempts have either been denied by the City or <br /> 21 upon discovering the easement,petitioners have cancelled their applications. She stated that the <br /> 22 owner also went before the Council at its June 21St meeting with a petition for an R3 Townhouse <br /> 23 Zoning District rezoning request. She stated that the Council denied the request due to concerns <br /> 24 about spot zoning. She stated that Mr. Martenson is now proposing to submit a rezoning request <br /> 25 that would change the current zoning of R1 to R2. She noted that the R2 Zoning District requires <br /> 26 that a corner lot have an area of 14,000 square fee and 100-feet in width at the building setback <br /> 27 line. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Ms. Moore-Sykes noted that the applicant is not present and asked the Commission how they <br /> 30 would like to handle this request. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Vice Chair Hanson noted that the City Council was against the original recommendation and felt <br /> 33 strongly that this was a case of spot zoning. He referenced the letter of explanation included with <br /> 34 the application stating that these are the changes the City Council was hoping for. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Commissioner Jensen asked if it is the normal practice to hold off on the Concept Review if the <br /> 37 applicant is not present. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that the applicant paid the fee for an August public hearing adding that <br /> 40 the review could be moved to August. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Commissioner Jenson stated that the Commission has reviewed proposals in the past for larger <br /> 43 lots requesting rezoning and subdivision noting that the requests were turned down to protect the <br /> 44 R1 zoning. He noted that the R2 structure next door is a church. <br /> 45 <br />