My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 08162005
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2005
>
PL PACKET 08162005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 4:25:15 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:24:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 08162005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> July 19, 2005 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1 Chair Stromgren noted that there is also a duplex located in that area that is zoned R2. <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Ms. Moore-Sykes confirmed stating that the owner admitted to using the structure as an R1 <br /> 4 Single-Family unit but that it was originally zoned as R2. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Chair Stromgren suggested forgoing the Concept Review. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Commissioner Young stated that she was hoping to see some form of proposal and hear an <br /> 9 explanation of the applicants' intentions. She noted that the intent is to build something that <br /> 10 resembles a single-family home noting that the residential buildings adjacent to this property are <br /> 11 all R1 adding that she has very strong feelings about the request based on the fact that this is an <br /> 12 R1 community. She noted that the R4 across the street and the ROS don't read as well in an area <br /> 13 like this and it is something that should be considered. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Chair Stromgren stated that with the information already received his concern is what would be <br /> 16 included for next month. He stated that he believes the Concept Review could be done at the <br /> 17 public hearing <br /> level if the applicant can provide detailed plans. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Commissioner Jensen stated that they are in favor of the R3 noting that it would be compatible <br /> 20 because this corner and the size of the structure could relate quite well depending on how it is <br /> 21 designed and if the access issues are addressed. He agreed that it would be good to review a <br /> 22 detailed site plan. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Commissioner Galyon agreed stating that he too is in favor of reviewing a detailed site plan. He <br /> 25 asked what kind of communication is put out to the residents of the area asking for their input on <br /> 26 the issues. He asked if the applicant or the City is responsible for collecting the feedback from <br /> 27 residents in the area. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Ms. Moore-Sykes explained that letters outlining the proposal are sent to all residents within <br /> 30 350-feet of the property. She further explained that the letters would explain what is happening <br /> 31 with the lot and clarify the proposal noting that the letter is their invitation to attend the public <br /> 32 hearing. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Commissioner Galyon stated that it would be in the best interest of the applicant to do due <br /> 35 diligence and visit with the residents of the area to make sure that what they are planning is not <br /> 36 upsetting anyone. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Motion by Commissioner Galyon, second by Commissioner Jensen, to recommend continuance <br /> 39 of the Concept Review for the proposed R1 to R2 Rezoning Request for 3645 Chelmsord Road, <br /> 40 NE to the first Planning Commission meeting in August 2005. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.