My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 08162005
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2005
>
PL PACKET 08162005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 4:25:15 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:24:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 08162005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> July 19, 2005 <br /> Page 5 <br /> 1 8.3 AMCON—St. Anthony Marketplace <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that Representatives from AMCON are back before the Commission to <br /> 4 request a Concept Review of their proposal for the Outlot on the corner of Kenzie Terrace and <br /> 5 Highway 88, St. Anthony Marketplace. She stated that Mr. Tucci submitted applications for a <br /> 6 Conditional Use Permit for a restaurant within 250-feet of a residential area; a Variance Petition <br /> 7 for the building setback on the Outlot; a Variance Petition for the on-site parking and an updated <br /> 8 landscaping plan. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Paul Tucci, OPPIDAN, representing AMCON St. Anthony, stated that he is back to provide the <br /> 11 Commission with an update noting that the last time this proposal went through Council there <br /> 12 was a lot of discussion. He indicated that the resounding comments were two-fold, stating that <br /> 13 the Council would prefer to see a restaurant on the Outlot. He stated that the Council was <br /> 14 concerned that at 3400 square feet that the structure would be too small for restaurant and that it <br /> 15 could possibly turn into a bar versus a family-style restaurant. He stated that the plan is basically <br /> 16 the same plan from the first Concept Review and public hearing except that the restaurant is now <br /> 17 moved to the front, the drive-through window has been removed and a concrete patio has been <br /> 18 included and the parking requirements have been adjusted. He noted that they also increased the <br /> 19 size of the restaurant by approximately 1000 feet adding that the variance request still holds for <br /> 20 the setback and reviewed. He indicated that they have talked to the City's Landscaping Engineer <br /> 21 about the changes and would continue to work with Staff throughout the process. He stated that <br /> 22 it is their plan to use the same landscaper to ensure consistency. He noted that the storefront <br /> 23 elevations are the same adding that they no longer have multiple signs and assured the <br /> 24 Commission that the signage would meet all City requirements for size. He reviewed the <br /> 25 elevations from each side of the structure noting that they have added more windows and a door <br /> 26 exiting to the concrete patio to the east. He stated that the north elevation remains the same and <br /> 27 includes opaque glass to give the look of a storefront. He stated that they have also added more <br /> 28 glass to the west and carried the side look around to include the canopies. He stated that the <br /> 29 restaurant would have roughly 155 seats noting that the last proposal used 125 in the <br /> 30 calculations. He provided the Commission with an overview of the kitchen facilities and dining <br /> 31 area noting that it is similar to the original proposal adding that the dining area is a bit larger. He <br /> 32 stated that the menu offered would be American-fare, similar to a Champs style restaurant. He <br /> 33 stated that their understanding is that the liquor license would be 50/50 and outlined in the lease. <br /> 34 He assured the Commission that this restaurant would not be another Stonehouse noting that <br /> 35 they do plan to accommodate pull tabs, but they do not want this to be the impetus to push it over <br /> 36 the 50-percent ratio requirements. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Commissioner Galyon noted that the pull tab business tends to come to bar businesses adding <br /> 39 that he would like to ensure that everyone understands that the deal could be terminated if it <br /> 40 causes the operator to go over the 50/50 limit. He stated that he wants to be sure that this ratio is <br /> 41 not violated. Mr. Tucci assured the Commission that this concern would be addressed internally <br /> 42 within the documentation. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Commissioner Galyon asked if the patio area would also include outside dining. Mr. Tucci <br /> 45 stated that this is the intent for the outside patio area noting that per City Ordinance this area has <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.