Laserfiche WebLink
• CI[ArTER 15 <br /> Krebs v Town of N.Beltrami . If,after completing the above steps,the council decides the action is in <br /> County,213 Minn.344,6 the public interest, it may vacate the land by passing a resolution. <br /> N.W.2d 803(1942). <br /> Vacating a street or alley must be in the public interest. <br /> See also,13A Dunnell Minn. <br /> Digest Municipal Corporations <br /> §58.01. <br /> After adopting the resolution,the clerk must prepare and present to the <br /> county auditor and the county recorder a notice that the council has <br /> completed the vacation proceedings. <br /> A.G.Op.59-A-53(Jan. 13, When a city lawfully vacates a street,the owner of the abutting property <br /> 1977). holds title to the land in the former street(presumably to the centerline) free <br /> of easements either in favor of the public or owners of other property abutting <br /> Minn.stat.§160.29. on the street. Cities may specify the extent to which a proposed vacation <br /> affects existing utility easements,including the right to maintain and continue <br /> utility easements. <br /> If the city actually owns the dedicated street,the resolution vacating the street <br /> does not divest the city of its rights to the property. It still may dispose of the <br /> property on which the street was located. It is unusual that a city would own a <br /> street; a city does not gain ownership by plat dedication. <br /> In re Hull,163 Minn.439,204 An abutting property owner who suffers peculiar damages from the vacation <br /> • N.W.534(1925). of the street may be entitled to compensation, but not if the only complaint is <br /> that the person must travel further or over a poorer road when going to and <br /> from the property. <br /> Minn.Scat.§505.14. For streets in private and in certain platted territories,there is also a district <br /> In re Verbick,607 N.W.2d 148 court procedure for vacation. The street may be vacated only if it is useless <br /> (Minn Ct.App.2000). for its original purpose.The courts broadly construe the terms"useless" and <br /> "purpose."Merely showing the street is not presently used is insufficient to <br /> show uselessness. Before a court may grant an application,the mayor of the <br /> city must receive personal notification of the application at least 10 days <br /> before the court intends to hear the application. <br /> B. Eminent domain <br /> Minn.Stat.§465 01. All cities have the authority to take private property for public use as long as <br /> Minn.Stat.§ 117.011. they pay the landowner reasonable compensation. This occurs through a <br /> process referred to as eminent domain dr condemnation. All cities must use <br /> Minn.stat.ch 117. the process of condemnation found in state law.The property need not be <br /> City of Shakopee v.Clark,295 situated within the city's corporate limits. If another public body holds the <br /> N W.2d 495(Minn. 1980). property,the city must show a strong necessity for the condemnation. <br /> School Dist.No.40 v.Bolstad, <br /> 121 Minn.376,141 N.W.801 <br /> (1913). <br /> • <br /> HANDBOOK FOR MINNESOTA CITIES 15-41 <br /> This chapter last revised 12/15/2004 <br />