My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 03212006
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2006
>
PL PACKET 03212006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2016 12:57:50 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:26:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 03212006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' CHAPTER 15 • <br /> Essentially,as long as a public purpose exists and the landowner is paid the <br /> value of the property fixed in Minnesota by court-appointed commissioners, a <br /> city is allowed to acquire property against the will of the landowner. <br /> However, it should be clear that a city might not always have the right to <br /> institute eminent domain proceedings upon a landowner's mere refusal to <br /> sell. <br /> Regents of the Univ.of Minn.v. For example,a public body may not acquire property for speculative future <br /> Chicago&N W.Transp.Co., use by condemnation. The condemning authority must establish that it <br /> 552 N W.2d 578(Minn.C1. <br /> App. 1996). intends to use the property for a particular, identified public purpose within a <br /> reasonable time. <br /> County of Stearns v. Voller,584 The courts give great weight to a condemning authority's decision,which <br /> N.W.2d.800(Minn Ct App. will be overturned only if it is arbitrary or unreasonable, or if the evidence <br /> Oct. 19,1998). �' <br /> against the necessity or public use is overwhelming. If the proposed taking is <br /> reasonably necessary or convenient for the furtherance of a proper purpose,it <br /> will be upheld. The city does not have to show absolute necessity to acquire <br /> the property in order to take property by condemnation. Showing reasonable <br /> necessity or convenience for public use is sufficient,unless the condemnation <br /> action is between two condemning authorities and the land in question is <br /> already dedicated to a public purpose. <br /> Minn.stat.cit. 117. To acquire property by eminent domain, cities must follow the procedure in • <br /> the comprehensive eminent domain statute.Under that law, the council <br /> typically begins proceedings by passing a resolution. The city must then file a <br /> petition with the district court stating the proposed public purpose. If the <br /> court determines the purpose is an authorized public purpose,it appoints <br /> commissioners to appraise the landowner's damages. The parties may appeal <br /> the commissioners' appraisal. <br /> Minn.stat.§ 117.036. When seeking to acquire property for transportation purposes,the acquiring <br /> authority must obtain at least one appraisal and share appraisal information <br /> with the property owner before submitting an eminent domain petition to the <br /> courts. The acquiring authority must negotiate in good faith for direct <br /> purchase before using eminent domain. <br /> Minn.stat.§ 117.016. When one city needs part of a tract of land for a public purpose and another <br /> city needs other parts for a public purpose,they may enter into an agreement <br /> for joint acquisition of the land by eminent domain. <br /> Town oJFavaI v.Citv of A township does not have the express or implied statutory authority to <br /> (MinEvelethn Ct87 N.W 99)24 ccondemn a municipality's property that is devoted to public use. <br /> 15-42 HANDBOOK FOR MINNESOTA CITIES <br /> This chapter last revised 12/15/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.