My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 11212006
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2006
>
PL PACKET 11212006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 4:28:02 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 4:27:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
33
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2005-2011
SP Name
PL PACKET 11212006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> October 17, 2006 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 1 Mr. Archambeau replied he believed they were roughly 13 or 14 inches high. <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Commissioner Jenson asked Mr. Archambeau if the proposed 14.5 inches would replicate what is <br /> 4 currently in place. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Mr. Archambeau replied the proposed sign would be no larger than the current sign. He <br /> 7 displayed a graphic of the proposed sign stating only two of the products carried would be <br /> 8 displayed; a smaller space for the sign may be required. He mentioned the current sign advertises <br /> 9 three products. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Commissioner Jensen asked Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes if what is proposed is that <br /> 12 okay the height be limited to the smaller of the two sizes displayed on the graphic; he did not see <br /> 13 the harm in having a 21-inch number if that is what has been submitted in the package. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Mr. Archambeau replied the upper portion of the sign is 21.5 inches; what is written in the packet <br /> 16 is that the numbers themselves could not be more than 14.5 inches in height. Mr. Archambeau <br /> 17 stated the way he interprets the display is the top portion of the sign would be 21.5 inches. He <br /> 18 stated he is not sure of the exact height of the digital display. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Chair Stromgren stated if it stays as written, Mobil would have the option of making it smaller or <br /> 21 adding the third product. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated at the last meeting,the Commissioners talked about <br /> 24 the size and not wanting them more than 14.5 inch high. She mentioned this is the public <br /> 25 hearing for changes to the ordinance. She mentioned Council would hold three readings. <br /> 26 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated if the Commission wants to suggest a taller font size, <br /> 27 Staff could do that. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Chair Stromgren commented, based on his unscientific survey, the current size at the stations in <br /> 30 St Anthony seem to work fine. He stated electronic signs would be that much more obvious and <br /> 31 easer to read; the larger size would not be needed for slower speed streets. He stated that if they <br /> 32 were on an interstate, it would be different. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Commissioner Jensen stated the rewriting of the code applies only if the sign is on a pylon sign. <br /> 35 He explained a number of businesses have a monument signs and he did not see why the benefit <br /> 36 could not be carried over to the monument signs also. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Commissioner Galyon asked Commissioner Jensen if he was referring to only gas stations. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Commissioner Jensen stated what is often seen in a refurbished gas station is a sign incorporated <br /> 41 into a monument sign. He stated he did not see why it must state only a pylon sign or what harm <br /> 42 it would cause the community to include a monument sign. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Assistant City Manager Moore-Sykes stated the applicant had asked the pylon sign to become <br /> 45 electronic because it is the most difficult to reach manually. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.