Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br /> To: Chair and Planning Commission Members <br /> From: Kin Moore-Sykes,Assistant City Manager <br /> Date: November 15, 2011 <br /> Subject: Subdivision without Platting Request — 3629 Roosevelt Street NE <br /> Requested Action: Concept Review <br /> Date Application Received: N/A <br /> Property Address: 3629 Roosevelt Street NE <br /> Zoning District: R-1 <br /> 60-Day Expires: N/A <br /> Waiver Letter Required: Yes Date Sent: No <br /> Future Action: Council Approval of Planning Commission Recommendation <br /> Background: <br /> Mr. Larry Alm contacted Staff asking if there was a way to combine the five (5) lots that make up his property at <br /> 3629 Roosevelt Street NE. He plans to build a home on these lots and would like to have all the lots combined <br /> so that he would receive one property tax statement. <br /> Analysis: <br /> Staff researched the City's Zoning Ordinance and contacted the City Attorney. It appears that it is a simple <br /> process to combine residential lots as long as in the process, non-conforming lots are not created. Mr. Alm just <br /> wants to combine these lots that are all interior R-1 lots and each is less than the required 9,000 SF lot area. Mr. <br /> Alm stated that he has no wish to subdivide them again once they are combined as he wants to build a house. <br /> He stated that he would like to receive just one property tax statement rather than five. <br /> In speaking with the City Attorney,it is a matter of having the Planning Commission review the proposal, send <br /> on a recommendation to the City Council and requesting the City Council approve the lot combination by <br /> resolution. <br /> By combining these lots, Mr.Alm would create a single, R-1 interior lot that is 22,842 SF. <br /> 5151.08 of the City's Zoning Code states that the City Council may waive compliance with the platting <br /> requirements and approve subdivision by conveyance of land by adoption of a resolution that in effect,based on <br /> findings by the City Council that: <br /> a. Compliance with the platting requirements would create an unnecessary hardship or expense because <br /> of the nature of the subdivision;and <br /> b. Failure to require the filing of a plat does not interfere with the purposes of this subchapter. <br />