Laserfiche WebLink
,2 9 <br />Today's debate: BURGLAR ALARMS <br />With every alarm <br />i Burglar alarm com- Jacksonville l . ou pa" <br />panles sell you se. Even though man large <br />Curl . But tempt to confirm burglar Y rage companies at <br />tY .. Taxpayers provide it. alarms, police an= <br />Why don't the companies pay? swer an average of two false alarms <br />P Y• sys- <br />tem Per year. with six freeb' Per <br />By 2000 b much incentive to strai res, there s not <br />generati u n�az systems could be solution, found in Seattlghten up. A better <br />ng P to 40 million <br />false alarms <br />Year, according to best estimates. <br />So let's do _some doomsday <br />a homeowners for each false alms fines es <br />arm and fines <br />alarm companies if they don't try to <br />math In v <br />1995, police in Dallas answered 134 arms first That improves account <br />alarms, of which 132 ability and Puts sloppy operators <br />at a corn- <br />Say say responding m those ere false. s petitive disadvantage . <br />the equivalent of 80 calls was At the other end Las Vegas <br />Pull -time s <br />police won't <br />officers. By answer burglar alarms <br />that measure, if notl0 all This Police won't <br />at the end of the cent changes, taxpayers Policy runes its own <br />fury <br />could us Paying <br />the equivalent of 24,242 olffcers just to <br />h set of worries but <br />has effectively fimited public expense with <br />swer false alarms. an- <br />Ehcealready under way by local lead- <br />no re port ed loss of public safety. Police still <br />respond places <br />departments and the security in- <br />dustry may reduce that <br />p�tpathe dbiufference Cities <br />like Philadelphia which issues <br />number. But even <br />if it can be cut drain 50%, remainder con- <br />stitutes agiant drain of <br />alarm per - <br />mits, also revoke them. Others a Toronto, <br />for one — stop responding <br />pu <br />publi c resources. <br />The alarm industry (1996 revenues: $11 <br />billion) sells security. But <br />to chronic of- <br />fenders. Elsewhere, police give burglar <br />alarms a low priority. The <br />the public actual- <br />IY Provides it by paying the police who an <br />best solution no <br />doubt mixes all these ideas, and others that <br />swer the calls. That massive subsidy has <br />helped the industry sign <br />stress better training of installers and better <br />education of consumers <br />up almost 24 mil- <br />lion homes i a less than 30 years. <br />Despite that growth <br />. <br />On balance, however, the remedy must <br />feature fines for consumers <br />— and the drag it <br />P) on local resources al efforts to im- <br />Pose accountability for false alarms <br />and companies <br />alike that are stiff enough to cover the cost <br />of responding to false alarms. Also key: <br />Also <br />are <br />feeble. Although many cities im- <br />pose fines, the fines <br />the. <br />mostly <br />ability to cut off offenders if contin- <br />ue. Taxpayers should <br />can be Ugh — in Do- <br />ver, N.H., $25 per false call . And, often <br />be happy to pay <br />when the police answer real emergencies. <br />cit- <br />ies allow a number offree false alarms — in <br />They should be angry that they also pay for <br />the 95% of all burglar <br />alarms that are false. <br />