My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WORKSESSION 08032009
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2009
>
CC WORKSESSION 08032009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2016 9:32:17 AM
Creation date
7/19/2016 9:31:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />Two exceptions are: <br />(1) The 2010 Mayor /City Council budget was increased to include pay for planning <br />commission members. <br />(2) The 2010 Police budget reflects $11,300 in step increases due three officers of the <br />Police Department. To calculate this budget staff used 2008 actual costs of <br />$1,681,859 times 3.5% for 2009 = $1,740,724 + $11,300 for step increases <br />totals $1,752,024 (2010 budget = $1,752,100). <br />In preparing the 2010 budget, Non - salary expenditure line items were also restructured to <br />adjust budgeted expenditures closer to actual costs. Whenever applicable, the basic <br />method used to determine the 2010 budget included taking a two year average (2007 & <br />2008) of actual costs. <br />In addition to using a two -year averaging method, Staff considered using three and five <br />year averages of actual costs. When reviewing these numbers it became apparent that a <br />two -year average reflected costs that were the closest to current expenditures and current <br />activity. <br />Three years didn't change the numbers much and we started picking up data that did not <br />reflect current activity such as the utility costs for additional street lighting. When using <br />a five -year average it became very apparent that the chance of including statistics that <br />would not accurately reflect current costs or activity significantly increased. <br />A clear example of this would be fuel costs. The cost of fuel increased dramatically in <br />2008. Using a five -year average of actual costs expenditures would be from 2004 <br />through 2008. In 2004, the volatility of fuel costs was not an issue. In addition, using <br />2004 data we started picking up actual costs before the hiring of a police officer or <br />including expenditures when for a period of time the City operated with one less public <br />works employee. <br />Examples of two -year averaging would be as follows: <br />Mayor /City Council - Consulting Services (101- 40100 -320) 2007 Actual $5,500 + 2008 <br />Actual $8,781 Divided by 2 = $7,140.50 (2010 Budget = $7,100). <br />Engineering - Consulting Services (101- 40700 -320) 2007 Actual $2,775 + 2008 Actual <br />$3,612 Divided by 2 = $3,193.50 (2010 Budget = $3,200). <br />Fire — Training (101- 41200 -341) 2007 Actual $4,575 + 2008 Actual $5,762 Divided by 2 <br />_ $5,168.50 (2010 Budget = $5,200). <br />Parks — Central Park Lights (101- 45500 -336) 2007 Actual $19,695 + $15,350 Divided by <br />2 = $17,522.50 (2010 Budget = 17,500). <br />When going through the process of restructuring the budgets, both revenue and <br />expenditure line items were adjusted to reflect closer to actual. It should be noted that by <br />restructuring the budgeting process, some budgets increased while other decreased. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.