Laserfiche WebLink
C)ORSEY <br />Second, the City must continue making the Fannie Mae payments to avoid a foreclosure <br />on the Phase 1 B Property. Apache has had some success in marketing the Property, but has <br />persistently failed to make the payments owed to Fannie Mae, so that obligation has fallen to <br />the City. These payments continue until the maturity date of December 31, 2010. Presumably, <br />the cash will be recoverable from Apache once the Property begins to generate income. <br />Option Two: Put Developer in Default Immediately; City Pays Fannie Mae in Full; and <br />Replaces Developer. <br />In light of the above disadvantages, and in order to best protect the asset, another option <br />is to pay off Fannie Mae at the earliest possible time and obtain a termination of the assignment <br />of the Mortgage from Fannie Mae. Doing so would restore the rights of a mortgagee in the City, <br />which gives the City considerably more control over the Property. I also recommend serving the <br />Developer with an updated notice of default. Pursuant to the Redevelopment Agreement and in <br />light of the current economic conditions, the Developer has up to 180 days to cure a default. <br />Serving such a notice not only starts the clock ticking for the City to exercise other remedies <br />under the Mortgage, but demonstrates to Developer that the City is serious about exercising <br />such remedies.' <br />Another advantage of paying off the Fannie Mae loan at the earliest possible time is that <br />the City will have additional default options under the Mortgage. The Mortgage provides that <br />the City may pursue all available remedies immediately upon an event of default under the <br />Mortgage. This includes commencing foreclosure proceedings against the Property. Unlike the <br />Redevelopment Agreement, there is not a time period for the Developer to cure the default. So, <br />once the Fannie Mae assignment of Mortgage is released, the City again has rights under the <br />Mortgage. <br />Taking this option to its logical conclusion, and assuming the HRA pays off the loan to <br />Fannie Mae and that Apache does not cure its defaults under the Redevelopment Agreement <br />and the Mortgage, the HRA could commence a foreclosure beginning on the date the Fannie <br />Mae loan is paid in full by the City. A foreclosure by advertisement takes approximately eight <br />months to complete. In addition, the City could terminate the Developer's rights under the <br />Redevelopment Agreement 180`h day after the new notice of default is served. Thus, the HRA <br />would own fee title to the Property approximately 8 months after Fannie Mae is paid in full. By <br />this time, the cure period under the Redevelopment Agreement would have also run and the <br />City could proceed with another developer for the Property. <br />Of course, the City will need to find the funds to pay -off Fannie Mae. The remaining <br />balance on the Fannie Mae Loan is approximately $1,882,000 (inclusive of interest payments). <br />As noted in the chart below, the City currently has identified funds of approximately $1.328 <br />million to go towards repayment. Staff and Ehlers will review options for the remaining <br />$560,000 needed to retire the debt. <br />' On October 2, 2008, the City provided a Notice of Default to Apache for failure to commence <br />construction of the Phase 1 B element. The City may have a reasonable basis to claim that this notice <br />satisfies the requirements of the Redevelopment Agreement and that, therefore, the period for cure rights <br />has expired. However, since the Fannie Mae loan is not due until December 31, 2010, we recommend <br />issuing a new default notice identifying all on -going defaults. <br />DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP <br />