My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WORKSESSION 08302010
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2010
>
CC WORKSESSION 08302010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2016 9:40:24 AM
Creation date
7/19/2016 9:40:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0CDRSEY <br />$ <br />Amount <br />210,697 <br />Source <br />Water Filtration <br />$ <br />210,697 <br />* Chandler TIF (Pooling Dollars <br />$ <br />210,697 <br />* Chandler TIF (Pooling Dollars <br />$ <br />690,000 <br />** Apache Cub TIF 25% oolin dollars <br />$ <br />560,000 <br />TBD <br />$ <br />1,882,090 <br />N/A <br />* Unrestricted TIF dollars since pre -1990 TIF district <br />** Restricted TIF dollars since created in 2003. Can only be used for "qualified" redevelopment activities <br />If the City pays off the remaining balance, it will have paid the entire amount of the loan that was <br />extended (approximately $2.6 million). Once the City has title to the Phase 1 B land, it is <br />anticipated that it would be repaid when development commences as follows: <br />City Outstanding Loan <br />City Outstanding Loan Amount on 1 -1 -11 <br />$ 2,630,471 <br />Land Sale Proceeds from Phase 1 B Land <br />$ 1,500,000 <br />TIF Generated From Phase !B <br />$ 1,130,471 <br />Remaining Balance <br />$ <br />Note: If the City were to utilize tax increment from both the Chandler and Apache Cub TIF <br />districts, the Council could decide that these funds don't need to be repaid since they are <br />"pooled" TIF dollars to accomplish redevelopment. If this was the case, the remaining unpaid <br />balance would be approximately $1.5 million. <br />A third option is to put Apache in default immediately, with the ultimate goal of replacing <br />it as Master Redeveloper, while attempting to negotiate and extension of loan terms from <br />Fannie Mae. <br />As stated above, in order to exercise the rights of the mortgagee, the HRA must have <br />those rights reinstated by paying off Fannie Mae and obtaining a termination of the assignment <br />of the Mortgage. Option Two requires that the HRA continue the Fannie Mae payments as and <br />when due, and Option Three requires that the HRA pay off the loan as soon as possible. From <br />a real estate perspective, recommend that the loan be paid in the near term and in any event <br />within the 180 day cure period. Since the HRA cannot exercise any of its real estate remedies <br />during this cure period, there is no real advantage to paying off the loan prior to the expiration of <br />the cure period. <br />The Mortgage allows the mortgagee to obtain the appointment of a receiver. A receiver, <br />once appointed, would step into the shoes of Apache to protect the asset and hopefully <br />generate revenue from the Property. Apache will likely argue that a receiver may not be <br />appointed until applicable notice and cure periods have run, so I again recommend serving <br />notice upon Apache that it is in default to commence the running of the cure period. <br />4 <br />DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.