My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WORKSESSION 08302010
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2010
>
CC WORKSESSION 08302010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2016 9:40:24 AM
Creation date
7/19/2016 9:40:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HORSEY <br />The foreclosure period will still take approximately 14 months to complete after a default <br />notice is served, but a receiver can be appointed to take over the Property promptly after the six <br />month cure period has lapsed. During the cure period, the HRA can identify a replacement <br />redeveloper, and such redeveloper can take control over the Property as receiver. Though a <br />court action is usually required to obtain the appointment of the receiver, the HRA will then have <br />the benefit of implementing the new redeveloper's plans much more quickly than the requisite <br />14 months required in a foreclosure. I also recommend proceeding with the foreclosure action <br />to regain fee title to the Property in a timely manner. <br />Option Four: Walk Away from the Project. <br />A fourth option is for the City to start the default process with the Developer and to cease <br />City payments to Fannie Mae. This would likely result in a Fannie Mae foreclosure on the <br />Property. In addition, the City has pledges its general obligation to the Fannie Mae loan, so <br />Fannie Mae is likely to seek a judgment against the City. Therefore, though the City does <br />legally have the option of walking away from the project and defaulting on the loan, this option <br />risks exposure for breach of contract and other legal claims. Due to the potential liabilities and <br />risk of damage to the credit of the City, we have determined that the HRA choosing to default <br />under its obligations is not a desirable course of action. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The City should serve a renewed notice of default on the Developer as soon as possible. <br />Doing so now gives the City maximum flexibility whether or not it chooses to continue to work <br />with Apache. During the 180 cure period which the Developer has under the Redevelopment <br />Agreement, the HRA should pay off the Fannie Mae loan and determine whether it wants to <br />continue working with Apache as master redeveloper. Paying off the Fannie Mae loan will allow <br />the City to take control of the Property at approximately the same time as the Developer's cure <br />period has expired. This strategy best protects the City's asset going forward, even if the <br />Developer cures the current defaults. <br />5 <br />DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.