Laserfiche WebLink
• 1 Who Would Do Construction? <br />2 Mr. Hamel said Gaughan has own construction superintendents, <br />3 estimators and support staff as well as general labor, but not <br />4 own crews, which is subbed out; <br />5 has full and part time staff of about 190 people of whom 35 <br />6 full time do nothing but construction and management. <br />7 Councilmember Makowske asked Mr. Hamel how he felt about this <br />8 project. He responded by saying he considered it to be a good <br />9 project for Gaughan because their major activity is in the <br />10 northern suburbs where they do well and this project should fit in <br />11 well with other developments in their portfolio for the region. <br />12 The Gaughan executive indicated his firm had been too involved in <br />13 the Columbia Heights project in 1980 to seriously consider this <br />14 project at that time; added that, after reading the 1980 feasibil- <br />15 ity study, wouldn't have wanted to do the 495 units of condominiums <br />16 for the project at that time, but Pat Gaughan now feels he can fill <br />17 100 units of senior housing and 100 units of non -senior rental over <br />18 a reasonable marketing period. <br />19 Mr. Hamel pointed to the LaBelle Park 248 unit condominium project <br />20 close by in Columbia Heights as an example of a type of project <br />21 which he thought would be very similar to the Kenzie Terrace <br />•22 project and one which had been very successful. <br />23 H.R.A. MAKES TOUGH CHOICE BETWEEN TWO EXCELLENT PROPOSALS <br />24 After Mr. Hamel had gone, Mr. Krier told the H.R.A. members he had <br />25 met at least three times with all the developers who had submitted <br />26 proposals for the project and at each meeting had requested they <br />27 update their proposals to meet H.R.A. requirements for brick <br />28 exteriors. He also said all developers had been alerted to the <br />29 part they would have to play in working with the neighbors adjacent <br />30 to the project. <br />31 He distributed the responses he had gotten from Sherman-Boosalis <br />32 and said the Walker -Stuart - Kraus -Anderson group proposal had been <br />33 for two, 4 story, 80 unit residential buildings which would be 70% <br />34 wood and fully sprinkled. He said they had offered to pay nothing <br />35 for the land and estimated would be paying $215,000 a year in <br />36 taxes. They would provide a $360,000 Letter of Credit but each <br />37 company would be responsible for their own project; Walker for the <br />38 senior; Stuart for the market rate; and K -A for the commercial; <br />39 and, if one failed, all would not necessarily have to fail. <br />40 Comments from H.R.A. and staff: <br />• <br />14 <br />