Laserfiche WebLink
-2 - <br />is completed at which time their share of the costs would be about 12%. The <br />redevelopers would reimburse the H.R.A. for the cost of the access when that hap- <br />pens, Mr. Soth added. <br />Motion by Commissioner Ranallo and seconded by Secretary/Treasurer Marks to adopt <br />H.R.A. Resolution 1985-009. <br />H.R.A. RESOLUTION 1985-009 <br />RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT <br />TO THE REDEVELOPMENT CONTRACT <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Consideration was next given to the proposed resolution whichwould approve the <br />Redevelopment and Tax Increment Plans for the Chandler Place_ senior rental apartment <br />project to be erected by the St_ Anthony_Health_Center on the _vacant _lot it owns <br />west of the health_center on the corner of 37th Avenue N.E. and Chandler Drive. <br />Updated cash flows for the tax increment returns were submitted to the Commissioners. <br />These showed the costs which would result if the City were to sell bonds to cover <br />the estimated costs foracquisition, soil correction, and administration. Mr. <br />Krier told the Commissioners this investment would help defray higher than anti- <br />cipated soil corrections costs and would bring the costs of the project down at <br />the same time the City would receive a good return on its investment with the <br />tax increment receipts paying the bonds in 10 years and with the City also hold- <br />ing a second mortgage on the property in the amount of 5700,000, to be repaid upon <br />sale or beginning after 10 years. <br />• A bonding attorney from Dorsey & Whitney, the H.R.A. Attorney, had raised some un- <br />foreseen questions about the legality of the new proposal which the Planning Consult- <br />ant questioned saying he perceived that if that opinion were accurate, most of the <br />redevelopment projects he is involved in throughout the metropolitan area, and, <br />indeed those all over the state, "would be in real trouble". <br />The Executive Director indicated he was looking for the Commission reaction to a <br />proposal from the developer for the City to use $300,000 in reserve funds to pay <br />for part of the b_o_nd reserve_.with the loan to be_repaid__i n_.1991-.92 by tax increment <br />revenues. --"- -" <br />Reservations about providing safeguards for the City's investments as well -.as <br />concerns about the lack of liquidity for the next five or six years were expressed <br />by all the Commissioners—Commissioners_ <br />ors Ranallo and Makowske were apprehensive <br />about tying up the City's reserves for that length of time in the face of diminish- <br />ing aid from state and federal sources as well as the trend towards decreased <br />liquor revenues nationwide. (Mr. Krier told the Commissioners they would have to <br />weigh their decision between the possibility the City might need reserve funds, <br />which would not be available, and the fact that the City would actually be recaptur- <br />ing its investment twice from the developers; first, from the tax increment revenues, <br />and then from any profit on the sale of the property in the future. The latter was <br />true, the Planning Consultant said, because the proposal had been written on the <br />same payback principal followed by Minneapolis, Richfield, Eden Prairie, and other <br />municipalities, related to similar investments, that, if a community experiences <br />risk in investing in a project, its taxpayers deserve to share in the profits when <br />• the properties they have invested in are sold. <br />