Laserfiche WebLink
M91 <br />Mike Miller, Assistant Administrator for the Health Center and partner in the <br />• Chandler Place project, had been present for both the Council and H.R.A. meetings <br />that evening. He confirmed that six bids for the soil correction had come in about <br />$200,000 higher than expected, but Mr. Miller said, that was not really surprising <br />considering the problems the County has encountered with their road rebuilding <br />project in front of the property. <br />Commissioner Makowske questioned whether describing a project to be constructed on <br />a vacant piece of land as "redevelopment" or "deteriorated or deteriorating" could <br />be considered to meet the intent of the Minnesota statute governing the use of tax <br />increment financing. She referred .back to the letter from the League of Minnesota <br />Cities warning that the future integrity of the program was in jeopardy because of <br />abuses and the Commissioner said she just wanted to be certain the proposed project <br />would be in conformance with the statute. Mr. Krier replied by saying new legis- <br />lation had been passed which changed "blight" to "deteriorating" to accommodate a <br />similar project in Edina. He suggested a case could be made that "poor soiTcon- <br />ditions on this parcel could have the potential for having a deteriorating effect <br />on the development of surrounding areas." Mr. Soth suggested the legislators could <br />probably have written the statute to make a clearer distinction between "redeveloped" <br />and "developed" properties, but; he supported the Consultant's perception that <br />there had been many projects like Chandler Place which had gained approval for tax <br />increment financing. f <br />Mr. Krier said he had gone for the housing program because he perceived there would <br />be enough of the apartment renters who would meet the low or moderate income criteria <br />set for a housing district. Mr. Krier reminded the Commissioners that the term <br />"moderate" covered persons whose incomes did not exceed the County median for a <br />• family of four which was around $24,000. <br />The Planning Consultant advised the Commissioners that the new proposal for funding <br />the Chandler Place project should have no effect on their adopting the proposed <br />Redevelopment anddTax Increment Plans that evening so the project could start <br />before "the snow flies" if an acceptable Redevelopment Contract can be written <br />which would address the Commissioners' concerns about the safeguards and liquidity <br />of the proposed investment proposal and the legal questions are answered satis- <br />factorily, before the October 22nd meeting. Mr. Childs commented that it would be <br />up to him, Mr. Krier and Mr. Soth, to get that done by that date. <br />Motion by Secretary/Treasurer Marks and seconded by Vice Chair Enrooth to adopt <br />H.R.A. Resolution 1985-010 with the substitution of "or" for "and" in the phrase "low <br />and moderate income" in the last paragraph. <br />H.R.A. RESOLUTION 1985-010 <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ENTITLED, <br />"CHANDLER PLACE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT <br />PLAN", DATED OCTOBER 8, 1985 <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Motion by Secretary/Treasurer Marks and seconded by Commissioner Ranallo to adopt <br />H.R.A. Resolution 1985-011, again changing the description of the persons and <br />families who would benefit from the creation of the district in the second finding <br />is <br />to be of "low or moderate" income. <br />