My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 06242008
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2008
>
CC MINUTES 06242008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 9:07:51 AM
Creation date
8/25/2016 8:40:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />June 24, 2008 <br />Page 4 <br />1 to enhance the building, save energy, and make people's experience that come here a better one. <br />2 He will be voting no on this resolution for that reason. <br />4 A friendly amendment was made by Councilmember Stille and accepted to amend Resolution <br />5 08 -037 to include the following buildings in the list of buildings to receive a facility energy <br />6 assessment: Central Park Building, Well House #4 and Well House #5; and to correct the <br />7 following typo in the second Whereas: "...(1) system replacement costs die -due to age..." <br />8 <br />9 Ayes — 4, Nays — 1(Roth). Motion carried <br />10 <br />11 C. Tabled from June 10t" mectina• Consider Resolution 08 -040 Awarding a Bid for the <br />12 Water Reuse Facility Project Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates <br />13 <br />14 City Engineer Hubmer reviewed the resolution with the Council and indicated that five bids were <br />15 received on the Water Reuse Facility Project. The low bidder was Graham Penn -Co <br />16 Construction, Inc. Staff recommends the Council award the contract for the Water Reuse Facility <br />17 Project to Graham Penn -Co Construction, Inc. in the amount of $1,283,998.75. <br />18 <br />19 Councilmember Thuesen noted there is a wide difference between the low bid and the high bid <br />20 and asked whether the quality would be different in the work performed according to each of <br />21 these bids. <br />22 <br />23 City Engineer Hubmer explained there are a number of methods that could be used with this <br />24 project, and staff was looking for contractor alternatives with the bids. The company that came in <br />25 with the low bid will build the structure in place and pour it in place, which seems to be an <br />26 economical method. A lot of the price differential was related to the method that would be used. <br />27 Graham Penn -Co Construction recently completed a similar project in the City of Edina and <br />28 exceeded their expectations. <br />29 <br />30 Councilmember Thuesen questioned if the method that will be used by Graham Penn -Co <br />31 Construction is the correct way for the City of St. Anthony to proceed. <br />32 <br />33 City Engineer Hubmer responded in the affirmative and stated it will be a quality project. <br />34 <br />35 Councilmember Roth inquired about the amount of water that will be used from this water reuse <br />36 facility for field irrigation and whether the water currently used for irrigation is treated. <br />37 <br />38 City Engineer Hubmer replied on average between 8 to 9 million gallons of drinking water per <br />39 year are used to irrigate Central Park. About 6 million gallons of that irrigation water will come <br />40 from the water reuse facility. <br />41 <br />42 Councilmember Roth questioned if this project will save wear and tear on the City's water <br />43 system over time. <br />44 <br />45 City Engineer Hubmer replied it will save in chemical costs, life of the filters and reduce the <br />46 amount of non - billable water that the City uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.