Laserfiche WebLink
10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />May 27, 2008 <br />Page 3 <br />Assessment of Residential Parcels on Municipal Street Aid Routes at a Level Not to Exceed the <br />Cost to Construct Local Interior Streets and Other Minor Amendments. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />B. City Engineer Update. <br />Todd Hubmer, City Engineer, stated the 2007 street reconstruction project has been completed <br />with some punch list items remaining. <br />Mr. Hubmer advised that the Silver Lake Road reconstruction has begun and they were currently <br />working on the utilities. <br />Mr. Hubmer stated the backwash water reuse facility was out for bid. <br />Mr. Hubmer explained they were currently working on the Capital Improvement Plan. <br />C. Consider Ordinance 08 -005; Chapter 9 — Parking During Snow Removal (Final Reading). <br />City Manager Morrison reviewed the resolution with the Council and stated this was the third <br />and final reading. He noted it results in a change to the City ordinance on parking during snow <br />removal to make it less restrictive. He reviewed the Ordinance. <br />Councilmember Gray asked if there had been any additional concerns added. City Manager <br />Morrison responded he had received one additional complaint, so there were a total of four <br />complaints received. <br />Motion by Councilmember Roth, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to approval Final Reading <br />and adopt Ordinance 08 -005; Chapter 9 — Parking During Snow Removal. <br />Councilmember Stille stated he was voting against this because he believed it would be difficult <br />to change back after the sunset expired. He noted it was not broken and he did not believe it <br />needed to be fixed. <br />Ayes — 4, Nay —1 (Stifle). Motion carried. <br />D. Consider Resolution 08 -037, Proposal for Facility Assessment Services from Sebesta <br />Blomberg and Associates Inc. with the funding source for this project being HRA <br />Projects Fund #31. <br />City Manager Morrison reviewed the resolution with the Council and indicated that Sebesta <br />Blomberg & Associates will provide a building assessment for the City on the Community <br />Center Building. Any items that require competitive bidding, a specification sheet would be <br />developed by Sebesta Blomberg much like a specification sheet for a road project that WSB <br />completes for the City. <br />