Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />May 23, 2006 <br />Page 14 <br />2 Mayor Faust stated the City receives their cash from the County on June 15 and December 15. <br />3 The numbers shown may look like quite a bit, but the City must make it through to the next <br />4 payment cycle. Mr. Mall informed the Council that the State auditor recommends a minimum 30 <br />5 percent. Once a city achieves 50 percent anything over is termed as "in excess" of what is <br />6 needed. Mayor Faust stated the City is at the minimum of what the State auditor recommends <br />7 and perhaps should set a goal of 35 percent to off -set any unforeseen expenditures. <br />8 <br />9 Mr. Mall next presented the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund for sewer operations over the past <br />10 two years. He noted no change to sewer rates in 2005. Again, operating revenue exceeded <br />11 operational expenditures. The biggest portion of operating expenses is the payment to the <br />12 Metropolitan Council Environmental Services for processing of sewage <br />13 <br />14 The analysis of the 2005 activity of liquor operations generated a net income of $269,000 or 5.1 <br />15 percent of sales. Operating expenses increased over a two year period partly due to the opening <br />16 of two new stores. A comparison of state averages of municipal -owned liquor operations <br />17 indicates the City is performing favorably. <br />18 <br />19 The HRA fund balance shows a total fund balance of $3,421,000 at the end of 2005. <br />20 <br />21 Councilmember Stille asked Mr. Mall if the recommendations within the body of the letter were <br />22 considered major or minor issues. Specific levels relate to internal controls. Different levels are <br />23 used by the auditors. <br />24 <br />25 Mr. Mall stated that none of the items reached the level of a material weakness. The six items <br />26 were identified in the internal control report were deemed a reportable condition. The others in <br />27 the report are considered `other matters' and are not as significant or severe. During the audit, <br />28 informal discussions included procedures to prevent fraud. <br />29 <br />30 Mayor Faust asked about accounting for uncollected taxes and how it is reported. Mr. Mall <br />31 answered that they look at that when the audit is conducted. The City cannot recognize <br />32 uncollected taxes as revenue. When the auditor looks at the government wide financial statement <br />33 of net assets, the City is given consideration for doubtful accounts. This is measured and deemed <br />34 not material. Most cities chose to not record an allowance for uncollectible moneys. <br />35 <br />36 Councilmember Stille commented that the 30 percent cash available was discussed at a budget <br />37 meeting. The City's balance sheet indicates the City is in good condition. He looks forward to a <br />38 good relationship going forward with the new accounting Firm. He recognized and thanked <br />39 Finance Director Roger Larson for his recommendation to change auditors. <br />40 <br />41 Motion by Councilmember Horst, seconded by Councilmember Thuesen, to approve Resolution <br />42 06 -055; Approving the Audit for the City of St. Anthony for the year ended December 31, 2005. <br />43 <br />44 Motion carried unanimously. <br />45 <br />46 VI. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL. <br />