Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />January 11, 2005 <br />Page 5 <br />4 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />n, <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 VI. <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />AS <br />IN <br />l <br />Mayor Faust pointed out that Quest Development may resubmit a different plan. He asked if the <br />Council had questions. <br />Councilmember Horst asked if Mr. Gilligan had reviewed this request. Mr. Gilligan responded <br />he did, and stated that since it does not appear that Quest has sufficient ownership interest in the <br />other PUD, they cannot amend that PUD. He advised they should return and request a variance <br />from the requirements, or an amendment from the code. <br />Councilmember Horst asked whether Quest would rather have a PUD than be rezoned. Chair <br />Stromgren answered they want to have mixed use, and therefore need a PUD. He added that the <br />City would need to grant a variance for the land area. <br />Councilmember Stille inquired what the consensus was of the Planning Commission. Chair <br />Stromgren responded that the concerns of the Staff and City Consultants included whether the <br />utilities would be sufficient to handle the requirements. He noted that one neighbor spoke to the <br />issue of density and traffic. He said he understood a full blown traffic study was not completed. <br />Councilmember Stille clarified whether the City could grant less than a 60 -day extension when <br />that request is made. Mr. Gilligan explained less than 60 days can be granted, with one <br />extension. In this case, if another extension is requested before February 8, 2005, it could be <br />granted. <br />Motion by Councilmember Stille, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to grant a 30 day extension <br />on Resolution 05 -014, and require the presence of Quest Development Inc. at the City Council <br />February 8, 2005 meeting to present their plan for action and to get a legal opinion from counsel. <br />City Manager Monson asked if a Planning Commissioner could return to give a full staff report <br />on February 8, 2005. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL. <br />A. 2005 Street Improvement Assessments. <br />1. Resolution 05 -015: Calling a Hearing on 2005 Street and Utility Improvements. <br />Mayor Faust welcomed Todd Hubmer, WSB & Associates, to the meeting. <br />Mr. Hubmer noted that 11 bids were received for the 2005 Street Reconstruction project. He <br />said the low bid was for $1,311,115.722, and that it is anticipated the Council will consider this <br />contract award at the February 22, 2005 meeting. <br />Mr. Hubmer reviewed Resolution 05 -015, and noted that the estimated cost of improvements is <br />$1,800,000. He noted the public hearing for proposed improvements will be held on February 8, <br />2005 at 7:00 p.m. <br />Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Horst, to adopt Resolution <br />05 -015, Calling a Hearing on 2005 Street and Utility Improvements. <br />