My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 06142005
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC MINUTES 06142005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 11:10:35 AM
Creation date
8/25/2016 11:10:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />June 14, 2005 <br />Page 10 <br />1 food in sales there. He said it doesn't seem to make sense. He would be more in favor of putting <br />2 the restaurant on the point, and felt it would have a better chance of making it and be more in <br />3 line of what the community wants. He said he feels the end cap would turn into a bar. <br />4 <br />5 Councilmember Thuesen said there have been many months to think about this project. Some <br />6 good things have come of it. He said the City can be proud of the new liquor stores, as they are <br />7 an asset to the community. He noted he has been on the Council seven years, and has been part <br />8 of many decisions. He has been able to gather information and come to decisions feeling <br />9 strongly in the way he wants to go. He said he does not feel strongly this time. He has come to <br />10 the conclusion that a bar /restaurant on the end cap at 3,500 square feet does not feel right. He <br />11 said whatever is done with the existing pad must be done right. This is an important gateway <br />12 into the community. Having a restaurant on the end cap is something he cannot support. He said <br />13 he does appreciate the $150,000 payment offer and does appreciate the negotiations that happen <br />14 there. He said he is open to the possibility of it going in the open pad; however a bar cannot go <br />15 in there. <br />16 <br />17 Mayor Faust said he heard talk about the $150,000 and it is a significant amount of money. In <br />18 terms of what this means to the citizens, he said there was a report from the Finance Director. <br />19 When the City took over the funding from the school on the levy, which was $52,000, the report <br />20 said it would increase the taxes $5 per average median house, which is in the $200,000 to <br />21 $220,000 range. Therefore, the $150,000 would equate to a $15 one -time payment reduction in <br />22 taxes and then it is not so overwhelming. He made the observation that the Planning <br />23 Commission didn't have the benefit of the development agreement when they looked at this. He <br />24 said the Council should not disparage what the Planning Commission did, therefore. As a <br />25 sidelight, he said he received a call from Dunn Brothers that they found out they would not get a <br />26 drive through, and they were lobbying him for that. That drive through was withdrawn three <br />27 weeks ago and evidently the communication does not work both ways. <br />28 <br />29 Councilmember Horst stated he would like to see some flexibility in the development agreement <br />30 at this point. If the 6,000 square foot restaurant is not feasible or practical, it can be worked <br />31 with. As a reasonable body, the Council ought to see how we can work with this developer and <br />32 get the project back on the track. He said this is falling of the track and we are stumbling. He <br />33 suggested looking at a more realistic approach, perhaps regarding pull tabs or size. He said he <br />34 did not want to see this project go away <br />35 <br />36 Mayor Faust gave the reminder that the Council is only looking at the development agreement, <br />37 and it is just a concept at this point. The Council must act on the Resolution before them. Then <br />38 it is incumbent on the developer to come back with something that is more fleshed out. After <br />39 that, the development agreement can be looked at again. There is a reason we have these <br />40 development agreements which is to give us a vehicle to have discussions with the developers. <br />41 <br />42 Motion by Councilmember Horst, seconded by Councilmember Gray, to deny Resolution 05- <br />43 044, re: Amendment to Developer Agreement between the City of St. Anthony and Amcon, <br />44 LLC. <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.