Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />April 26, 2011 <br />Page 2 <br />IV. PUBLIC HEARING. <br />A. 2012 Budget. Mike Mornson, City Manager, and Roger Larson, Finance Director. <br />presenting. <br />7 Mayor Faust opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. <br />8 <br />9 City Manager Morrison stated that the public hearing is intended to obtain preliminary input as <br />10 the City enters the 2012 budgeting process. He presented an overview of the 2011 general <br />11 operating budget, the General Fund levy for 2011, and General Fund revenues and expenditures <br />12 for 2011. He stated that 54% of the City's revenues come from the tax levy and noted that <br />13 General Fund expenditures have remained consistent over the past ten years. <br />14 <br />15 Mayor Faust pointed out that the City does not receive Local Government Aid (LGA). He stated <br />16 that while the General Fund levy has remained at 0% for the past several years, the City will <br />17 need to review the way it provides services to the community and whether it can sustain a 0% <br />18 increase in the tax levy for 2012. <br />19 <br />20 No speakers were present. Mayor Faust closed the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. <br />21 <br />22 V. REPORTS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF. <br />23 <br />24 None. <br />25 <br />26 VI. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL. <br />27 <br />28 A. Ordinance 2011 -01: Amending the Tobacco Ordinance. Mike Mornson, City Manager, <br />29 presenting. <br />30 <br />31 City Manager Morrison stated that this represents the Third and Final Reading of the proposed <br />32 amendments to the tobacco ordinance and presented the staff report, legal opinion from counsel, <br />33 list of current tobacco license holders, and proposed revisions to the ordinance. <br />34 <br />35 Mr. Eric Brever, attorney for Flamezz Hookah, appeared before the City Council and reiterated <br />36 his client's objection to the proposed amendments. He stated the concept that somehow the <br />37 City's moratorium on June 22, 2010, provided his clients with notice that they should not have <br />— 38 spent funds on the renovation is misleading. He stated that in order to qualify for a completed <br />39 license application, his clients had to spend the money up front and put $180,000 into the <br />40 renovation last year, well before the moratorium was put in place; as a result, it is misleading to <br />41 state that his clients should not have spent that money. He also addressed the double standard <br />42 argument and stated he and his clients are struggling as to what it means to have that double <br />43 standard. He indicated that the minutes from the last Council meeting include a discussion <br />44 regarding current licensees. He referenced § 144.4167, subd. 4, which requires in order for <br />45 sampling to occur in a tobacco shop, the tobacco shop must have 90% of its gross revenue from <br />46 tobacco sales, which would disqualify all other licensees in the City other than Flamezz and <br />