My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 04262011
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2011
>
CC MINUTES 04262011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:00:26 PM
Creation date
8/25/2016 1:00:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />April 26, 2011 <br />Page 3 <br />1 Moonlight. He stated that this might put Wal -Mart or Cub at a disadvantage but it does not have <br />2 an effect on them because they are not eligible per the terms of this Statute. He stated that it <br />3 seems odd to protect those businesses against the competitive business practices of a local <br />4 business. He stated that there is no double standard and the ordinance is a problem. He disputed <br />5 the City Council's authority to pass the ordinance and the City Council is relying on § 144.417 to <br />6 enact a local ordinance to enforce the tobacco ordinance; however, it neglects the plain language <br />7 of § 144.4167 which does not prohibit the lighting of tobacco products by a customer or potential <br />8 customer. He reiterated that the City Council does not have authority to enact the ordinance as it <br />9 is. He stated that he has received calls from residents and the vast majority of them indicated <br />10 that the City Council is overreaching, and he and his clients agree. He requested that the City <br />I 1 Council reconsider its approach and look at it in a manner of applying the ordinance only to new <br />12 licensees. He stated that the City required his client to spend a lot of money, per City Code, to <br />13 put forth a ventilation system that is top notch and the City now seeks to change the ordinance to <br />14 try to trump State Statute. He stated that he and his client have suggested a fair compromise and <br />15 his clients will drop their objection if the ordinance is limited to new licensees only. He <br />16 concluded his remarks by advising the City that his clients have no other option than to fight this <br />17 should the City Council continue on its current course of action. <br />18 <br />19 Mr. Saeed Kiblawi, owner of Flamezz Hookah, appeared before the City Council and reiterated <br />20 Mr. Brever's statement that other licensees in the City cannot meet the 90% of gross revenue <br />21 requirement. He stated that he felt the double standard applied to him because the City required <br />22 him to remodel his space but now says he cannot operate his current business. <br />23 <br />24 Mr. Bilal Haidari, 3937 Silver Lake Road, appeared before the City Council and stated that he <br />25 encouraged Mr. Kiblawi to start his business in St. Anthony. He indicated that from day one, <br />26 Mr. Mblawi has been up -front with the City about his tobacco store and the sampling, and the <br />27 City told him what would be required to open his business. He stated that the City wants to <br />28 change things after Mr. Kiblawi has spent that much money to build his future and make a decent <br />29 living, and he did not feel it was fair to take this from him. He stated that if the City felt that the <br />30 sampling was not acceptable, that should have been made clear from day one and the City should <br />31 have been up -front with him. He asked that the City Council be fair. <br />32 <br />33 Councilmember Stille stated that the City Council has been struggling with this debate and the <br />34 City's moratorium over the past year. He indicated that the Statute says that people/businesses <br />35 can have tobacco shops and can light products for the specific purpose of sampling tobacco <br />36 products. He questioned how you compare sampling for other establishments to the sampling <br />37 taking place here. He advised that the City is not shutting down the business or forcing it to <br />38 close, and tobacco products can continue to be sold, but the practice of sampling prior to <br />39 purchase will not be allowed. He added that the City is removing the sampling because of <br />40 ambiguity in the statute. <br />41 <br />42 Councilmember Gray agreed and stated if sampling were used in the context of a bar and it was <br />43 okay to sample beer in the event a customer wanted to purchase the beer, would that mean that <br />44 people would be allowed to hang around and drink beer there? He questioned whether that was <br />45 sampling. He stated it appears that people hang out at Flamezz Hookah and smoke, so then the <br />46 sampling is broadened to include hanging out there and smoking and not to see if the people <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.