CC PACKET 10112016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

park for purchase by the residents of the park.” Id. at subd. 7. Subdivision 7 provides manufactured homeowners the same right of first refusal if 51 percent of the homeowners execute an agreement for the purchase of the park within 45 days. Id. Although Defendants dispute whether Plaintiffs satisfied the requirements of subdivision 6, for the purposes of Defendants’ motion these allegations are treated as true. Assuming that LGP violated Plaintiffs’ properly exercised right of first refusal under subdivision 6, the question that remains is: under the statutory framework, what is the appropriate redress? Subdivision 9 of section 327C.095, entitled, “Effect of noncompliance,” provides: If a manufactured home park is finally sold or converted to another use in violation of subdivision 6 or 7, the residents do not have any continuing right to purchase the park as a result of that sale or conversion. A violation of subdivision 6 or 7 is subject to section 8.31, except that relief shall be limited so that questions of marketability of title shall not be affected (emphasis added). Id. at subd. 9. There are no reported cases in Minnesota interpreting the language of subdivision 9. Thus, it is for this court to examine the language of Subdivision 9, without the benefit of guidance from a higher court. When the Court interprets a statute it must first be determined whether the statute’s language is clear and unambiguous on its face. Am. Family Ins. Group v. Schroedl, 616 N.W.2d 273, 277 (Minn. 2000). “A statute is only ambiguous when the language therein is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation.” Id. (quoting Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hosp., 598 N.W.2d 379, 384 (Minn.1999)). If a statute is clear and unambiguous it is interpreted using its plain meaning. Id. This court finds that the language of subdivision 9 is clear and unambiguous. Once the manufactured home park is sold, the plain language makes clear that the residents lose their right to purchase the park. Minn. Stat. § 327C.095, subd. 9. This applies even when “[a] violation of 37