Laserfiche WebLink
page 18 <br />16. Air: <br />a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any <br />emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air <br />pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including <br />any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of <br />any methods used assess the project’s effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. <br />Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or <br />mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. <br /> <br />No stationary source emissions are proposed as part of the proposed redevelopment. <br /> <br />b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the project’s traffic generation on air emissions. <br />Discuss the project’s vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic <br />operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or <br />mitigate vehicle-related emissions. <br /> <br />The EPA has identified a group of 93 compounds emitted from mobile sources that are listed in <br />their Integrated Risk Information System. In addition, the EPA identified seven compounds with <br />significant contributions from mobile sources that are among the national and regional-scale <br />cancer risk drivers. These are acrolein, benzene, 1, 3-butadiene, diesel particulate matter, plus <br />diesel exhaust organic gases (diesel PM), formaldehyde, naphthalene, and polycyclic organic <br />matter. While Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) considers these the priority mobile <br />source air toxics, the list is subject to change and may be adjusted in consideration of future EPA <br />rules. <br /> <br />EPA rule requires controls that will dramatically decrease Mobile Source Air Toxins (MSAT) <br />emissions through cleaner fuels and cleaner engines. According to an FHWA analysis using <br />EPA's MOBILE6.2 model, even if vehicle activity increases as assumed, a combined reduction of <br />72 percent in the total annual emission rate for the priority MSAT is projected from 1999 to 2050. <br /> <br />Air toxics analysis is a continuing area of research. While much work has been done to assess the <br />overall health risk of air toxics, many questions remain unanswered. In particular, the tools and <br />techniques for assessing project-specific health outcomes as a result of lifetime MSAT exposure <br />remain limited. These limitations impede the ability to evaluate how the potential health risks <br />posed by MSAT exposure should be factored into project-level decision-making within the <br />context of the National Environmental Policy Act. The FHWA will continue to monitor the <br />developing research in this emerging field. <br /> <br />Because of the uncertainties outlined above, a quantitative assessment of the effects of air toxic <br />emissions impacts on human health cannot be made at the project level. While available tools do <br />allow us to reasonably predict relative emissions changes between alternatives for larger projects, <br />the amount of MSAT emissions from each of the study scenarios and MSAT concentrations or <br />exposures created by each of the study scenarios cannot be predicted with enough accuracy to be <br />useful in estimating health impacts. Therefore, it is not possible to make a determination of <br />whether any of the scenarios would have "significant adverse impacts on the human <br />environment." <br /> <br />53