PL PACKET 06192012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

June 11, 2012 Page 3 1. The subject matter of the application is within the scope of this section. The application for a variance is necessary considering the proposal would result in the property further exceeding the maximum amount of allowable impervious surface. Criteria met. 2. Strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because: a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning code; The home currently does not have front steps or a connection from the front entrance to the driveway. Front steps or a walkway to the driveway are common among most homes in the neighborhood. The lack of an existing walkway from the driveway to the front door creates unsafe conditions on the property. Therefore, staff finds the proposal reasonable. Criteria met. b. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the property owner; The home was built in the 1940s prior to the implementation of the impervious surface ordinance. The garage was constructed in the back of the property and the driveway extends nearly the depth of the property to reach the garage, accounting for a significant portion of the impervious surface. These conditions existed when the homeowner purchased the property and are, therefore, not the fault of the property owner. Criteria met. C. The variance, ifgranted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and Granting the variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The use of the property would not change if the variance is granted. Walkways connecting the driveway to the front door are common in the neighborhood. Granting the variance would improve the appearance of the property and have a positive impact on the neighborhood. Criteria met. d. Economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. The applicant wishes to construct a sidewalk for safer access from the driveway to the front door and to provide an entrance step to the front door. While the proposed enhancements will improve the appearance and property value, economic considerations alone are not the basis of the practical difficulties. Criteria met. 3. The variance, if granted, would be consistent with the city's comprehensive land use plan. If the variance is granted, the use of the property would remain the same. The comprehensive plan guides this property for low density residential and is consistent with the application for a variance. Criteria met. 4. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning code. The intent of the zoning code is to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the city and its people through the establishment of minimum regulations governing land development and use. The zoning code is established to: