My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 06192012
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2012
>
PL PACKET 06192012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 3:08:52 PM
Creation date
11/1/2017 3:08:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 11, 2012 <br />Page 4 <br />a. Protect the use districts; <br />The proposal would not change the use of the property. The current use is consistent <br />with the zoning code. Criteria met. <br />b. Promote orderly development and redevelopment; <br />The proposal seeks to make an improvement to the property which staff finds to be <br />orderly. Criteria met. <br />c. Provide adequate light, air, and access to property; <br />The proposal would not negatively impact adequate light or air from reaching the <br />property or adjacent properties. The proposal seeks to improve access to the home. <br />Criteria met. <br />d. Prevent congestion in the public streets; <br />The proposal will have no impact on the amount of congestion in the public street. <br />Criteria met. <br />e. Prevent overcrowding of land and undue concentration of structures by regulating land, <br />buildings, yards, and densities; <br />The proposed improvement will increase lot coverage on a lot that already exceeds the <br />limits in place by the City's Zoning Code. The additional increase in impervious surface <br />has been minimized by the property owner to the extent practical in order to complete a <br />connection between the home and the driveway. In discussions with the City Engineer, it <br />is not believed that the additional square footage of impervious surface would have a <br />negative impact on water drainage in the area. Criteria met. <br />f. Provide for compatibility of different land uses; <br />The proposal will not result in a change of land use, nor will it conflict with adjacent land <br />uses. Criteria met. <br />POTENTIAL ACTION <br />1. Request Additional Information and Continue the Public Hearing. The Applicant appears to <br />have provided enough information for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation to <br />approve or deny the request. Should the Planning Commission request additional information <br />from the Applicant, the Planning Commission should continue the public hearing until a later <br />time. <br />2. Recommend Approval (with or without conditions) of the Variance. In the event of a <br />recommendation for approval (with or without conditions), the Planning Commission may refer <br />to Exhibit D, and may modify the draft resolution for approval to include any conditions that it <br />deems necessary. <br />3. Recommend Denial of the Variance. In the event the Planning Commission chooses denial of <br />the requested variance, it should clearly state its reasons for the denial recommendation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.