My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WORKSESSION 08282013
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2013
>
CC WORKSESSION 08282013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2017 10:50:20 AM
Creation date
11/3/2017 10:49:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
be 120 square feet or less in are <br />IIl. Garage Door Ooenines t.aravP dnnr nnen:nn shall be limited in height r" feet a mea ur d <br />from the driveway anron at the d or onenmo <br />W. (I+. Garage setback permit. A garage which will cover an area of no more than 528 square <br />feet and no dimension of which is greater than 24 feet may be located within the side setbacks and/or rear <br />setbacks if a setback permit has been issued for the garage under the following provisions of this section. <br />(1) Application for a setback permit must be made in writing on forms provided by the <br />City Manager and must be filed with the City Manager, together with a filing fee in the amount required <br />under Chapter 33. The application must include a survey showing the proposed location of the stmaPdre <br />building and the stmetures buildings on the property adjoining the setback in question. The application <br />must also address the other matters to be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council, as set <br />forth in division (B) above. The permit application will be considered by the Planning Commission and <br />City Council, and notice of the hearing will be given, all in the same manner as provided in § 152.243 for <br />conditional use permits. After the hearing by the Planning Commission, the City Council will grant or <br />deny the permit, stating its reasons for doing so. <br />(2) In granting or denying the setback permit, the City Council will consider the <br />proximity of the garage to any struetums ilzu s on the adjoining property, the extent of vegetation or <br />other screening on the subject property and the adjoining property, the effect of the garage on the light <br />and visibility available to the adjoining property, matters of fire safety, the existing garages on the <br />adjoining property, the ability to locate garages elsewhere on the subject property, and any other matters <br />which may be relevant to the degree of encroachment into the setback. <br />(3) If a setback permit is granted, it will run with the title to the property for which it was <br />granted so long as the garage for which it was granted continues to exist. If that strtietafe building is <br />destroyed or removed, the permit will automatically expire. <br />(1993 Code, § 1650.02) Penalty, see § 10.99 <br />fee as determined from time to time by the City Council shall he re d to prawsilic <br />Language for Discussion <br />Staff offers the above suggested language for review and discussion by the City Council. Some, all, none, <br />or a modification of the above language could be incorporated into the City's existing Ordinance relating <br />to accessory buildings. The additions to the Code attempt to address some of the concerns of staff <br />regarding the existing language. These concerns are centered around the height, size and number of <br />accessory buildings permitted on a property. As the Code is currently written, a property owner with a <br />single -story home could potentially construct a two -story accessory building. In addition, an accessory <br />building could be constructed that is larger than the principle building. There is currently nothing limiting <br />the size or number of accessory buildings other than the impervious surface requirement. A property <br />owner could construct any number of accessory buildings on a property so long as the impervious surface <br />requirement is met. The proposed additions to the Code are common among other cities as a way to <br />regulate orderly development. Staff believes that these requirements will help to ensure the character of <br />neighborhoods is preserved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.