CC PACKET 11142017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

November 8, 2017 Page 3 requires a permit (i.e. building permit for any interior work, sign permit, electrical permit, plumbing permit, etc.); 2. Applicant receives a revised SAC determination, per the Met Council. 3. The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or to the values of property in the vicinity; and Surrounding land uses in the immediate vicinity include a mix of two‐family residential, commercial, and planned unit development. The property to the north is primarily commercial in nature, and the parcel to the west across Stinson Blvd. is also commercial. To the east and south, the properties are residential, and designated for medium density residential development. The subject property currently has screening to the south and east to minimize traffic glare to the adjacent residential properties. If approved, the proposed use would be of a lower intensity than the existing gas station/convenience store, and would produce less traffic. Additionally, the hours of operation would be limited to daytime hours, further minimizing the impacts on adjoin properties. Criterion met. 4. The use will provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and will contribute to the general welfare. If approved, this facility will provide a supervised location with pick‐up and drop‐off services for senior citizens. The facility is intended to provide a space for social interaction and entertainment for senior members of the community and result in the adaptive reuse of a vacant building. Criterion met. CONCLUSION The Planning Commission met on October 24, 2017, held a public hearing, and recommended approval of the request unanimously. While the adult day‐care center use requires a conditional use permit in the C – Commercial District, there are no specific performance standards provided in the City ordinance other than the required State permitting. In reviewing this request, staff was unable to identify any specific issues that would violate the requirements for issuing a CUP and would recommend that the City Council take action to approve the request, subject to the conditions listed herein. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Adopt a resolution Approving the Conditional Use Permit. 2. Deny of the Conditional Use Permit, stating reasons for such, and direct staff to bring back a resolution. 3. Request Additional Information and Continue the Public Hearing. It appears the Applicant has provided all of the required information for the City Council’s evaluation. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Location map Exhibit B: Application and Supporting Material 39