My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 05222018
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2018
>
CC PACKET 05222018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2018 9:14:17 AM
Creation date
5/18/2018 11:21:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
St. Anthony Comprehensive Plan Public CommentsTransportation∙ In the community profile, include the number and percent of people who are able to drive a car, how many people who do not or cannot drive a car (by many estimates, about 40 percent of the population cannot or does not drive a car) and how the city will ensure these needs are met over time;xBike/Walk/Transit LanguageNo ChangeTransportationThe comprehensive plan should include details and plans to address issues related to the following:xTransportationThe plan should include commitments to design roads to reduce motor vehicle speeds for bicycle and pedestrian safety. While 30 mph is a conventional speed in residential areas, some streets should be identified in the plan to be designed and enforced at 25 mph or lower and not just limited to school zones.xBike/Walk LanguageNo ChageSustainabilityThe plan should include a plan for the urban forest and identify any projected challenges to the tree and related vegetation and plan to respond to these challenges. Discuss EAB and other threats to the urban forest. xtreesThis is for Parks ComSustainabilityInclude commitment to a tree inventory.xtreesThis is for Parks ComSustainabilityThis includes fully implementing ADA and Title VI requirements for public engagement to ensure the city serves all people and does not discriminate in the delivery of public services, activities and benefits. The Federal Highway Administration, the Department of Justice, MnDOT, and the Met Council should provide information on the requirements as well as resources and tools to implement ADA, Title VI and other nondiscrimination laws, regulations and policies.xADA ComplianceNoted language: "WSustainabilityThe comprehensive plan public process does not adequately address public engagement. For example, the comprehensive plan open house on April 11, 2018 did not provide notification of the rights under Title VI or the ADA to ask for and receive accommodations. Provide an additional comment period for the comprehensive plan and offer the plan in alternative formats.xMore public involvementNo ChangeSustainabilityThe lack of a transparent Title VI and ADA grievance process is concerning because the city should have been logging and incorporating the needs in the comprehensive plan that may have come about through a regular complaint process.xADA ComplianceNo ChangeSustainabilityThe comprehensive plan does not include any reference to the ADA transition plan or details on schedule of upgrades to meet ADA design standards. xADA ComplianceNo ChangeSustainabilityDesign Guidelines List on page 96; consider adding NACTO Guide for design recommendations. xImplementationColgate to CoolidgeXTransportationNo change to designation of Stinson PkwyDon't change bus route from McKinley to StinsonXTransportationBus Route ‐ On McKinleyCollector ‐ On Stinson PkwyTraffic Study Revisions ‐ ReviewTom Arshambeau's propertyXHousingPage 49: The Figure 5‐1 should be updated to reduce the lowest band (at or below 30% AMI) by 100 unitsPage 51: The home value ranges don't accurately correspond to the AMI ranges. The home value ranges also overlap, which means the figure might double count certain homes. There should be a policy stating that housing development projects will not be eligible for TIF unless they include affordable housing for a range of income levels and life stages. Need an inclusionary zoning policy.X ‐ Clarify language and owner occupied numbersGeneralPlease put more information on the website on the comment period deadlines and process.One public meeting (open house) doesn't seem like adequate outreachAlthough the draft plan has been on the website for on emonth, the city should be more proactive in gathering public inputXSustainabilityPage 175: Change "USBGC" to "USGBC"XSustainabilityCurbside collection of organics ‐ other than permitting ‐ how is the city supporting solar for residents?XChapter 636th and Silver Lake Road needs a light29th and 88 needs a redo37 and Silver Lake Rd needs a redoArbor Day ‐ Trees along the fence at Central ParkX10Continue to monitor train activity, and preparing for emergenciesXGeneralWould like to see more info on the city's website about how to input to the plan ‐ when does the school district input? Please add all the timelines and input opportunities including in push notifications/city newsletter. Also could there be more opportunities for the public to provide input? How can we engage better with those in apartments/rentals?XKristin MrozPage 20, figure 3‐11 The graphs are shown in different sizes. Please show in the same size to avoid manipulation on the data.xKristin MrozThe color coding for the sustainability section of the implementation plan does not match the legend.x321
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.