Laserfiche WebLink
New Brighton/St. Anthony Basic Water Management Project – Phase 1 Rice Creek Watershed District <br /> <br />5555-221 Revised Final 17 June 10, 2014 <br />4.1 CONVEYANCE MODIFICATION <br />One method to lower flood elevations on a drainage system is to simply increase the downstream <br />conveyance capacity. Although this is frequently the least expensive method of decreasing flood <br />elevations at a given location, a project solely consisting of increased conveyance will result in higher <br />peak flow rates and potentially greater flood risk downstream. In some locations where development has <br />occurred with little or no stormwater rate management (such as the contributing drainage to RCD 3), <br />increasing conveyance capacity may be the only feasible alternative for decreasing flood elevations since <br />locations for other stormwater management practices are limited. An increase in discharge to the public <br />drainage system open channels may require mitigation caused for flow changes, which can increase <br />erosion rates and require more frequent maintenance. There is no water quality benefit from this project <br />type. <br />4.2 DETENTION <br />Temporarily storing runoff, known as Detention Storage, is an effective way of controlling discharge rate <br />thereby reducing flood peaks and elevations downstream. There are several natural water bodies that <br />currently provide detention storage in the RCD 2, 3, and 5 watershed, including Jones Lake, Poplar Lake, <br />Silver Lake, Langton Lake, Wilson Lake, Hart Lake, Pike Lake, and Hansen Park along with several other <br />smaller water bodies. Preserving these volumes and examining opportunities to enhance their detention <br />capacity is critical in reducing downstream flooding. The opportunities to create additional detention <br />storage by constructing new stormwater ponds is likely limited because they typically require a sizeable <br />land footprint which may not be readily available in the RCD 2, 3, and 5 watershed due to its fully <br />developed condition. Thus, future project siting will likely focus on modifications to existing regional <br />basins rather than identifying new detention locations to increase the watershed’s detention storage. <br />Properly designed stormwater detention ponds can provide a significant water quality benefit in addition <br />to providing rate control. <br />4.3 VOLUME CONTROL <br />Volume control (i.e., reduction) is any practice that decreases runoff through infiltration, <br />evapotranspiration (ET), or reusing it for some other purpose. Volume control can be implemented <br />through a variety of practices summarized below. Each of these practice types improves downstream <br />water quality in addition to decreasing runoff rates. <br />Infiltration is providing an opportunity for runoff to infiltrate into the ground mimicking the natural <br />process that occurred prior to development. Common practices include infiltration basins and <br />trenches and curbside rain gardens. <br />Evapotranspiration is promoting the natural processes of evaporation and transpiration for stormwater <br />runoff. This can occur through combinations of standing water surfaces and vegetative root exposure <br />that yield volume reductions. Common practices that utilize this process include rain gardens and <br />bioretention basins. <br />79