Laserfiche WebLink
New Brighton/St. Anthony Basic Water Management Project – Phase 1 Rice Creek Watershed District <br /> <br />5555-221 Revised Final 18 June 10, 2014 <br />Water Reuse is the process of capturing stormwater runoff and utilizing it for another purpose. A <br />common reuse is for irrigation of managed turf areas such as athletic fields. Water reuse has been <br />incorporated into the District volume control rules for development and redevelopment. <br />Volume control BMPs should be considered as options to address the goals and objectives, but it is <br />important to understand their limitations for addressing the existing regional flooding issues. Infiltration <br />practices require specific site conditions, such as well-draining soils and sufficient separation from <br />groundwater levels that are not commonly present in the RCD 2, 3, and 5 contributing drainage area. <br />Evapotranspiration and water re-use practices generally treat runoff at site-level scale and thus have little <br />impact regionally until numerous practices are in place. Volume control BMPs typically provide little relief <br />for larger (>50-year recurrence) rainfall events since the storage volume provided by these practices is a <br />fraction of the runoff volume generated by these events. <br />4.4 FLOODPROOFING <br />Flood proofing is any measure, structural or non-structural, intended to prevent or reduce damage from <br />flooding to structures. Flood proofing is typically utilized when other project types cannot sufficiently or <br />feasibly mitigate the flood risk. The factors that dictate whether flood proofing can provide adequate <br />protection include: <br />x The height of maximum flood level on the structure <br />x Velocity of water near the structure <br />x Duration and frequency of floods <br />x Economic considerations <br />4.5 PROJECT TYPE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY <br />It is clear that conveyance modifications and the addition of detention storage in a system can be <br />effective at lowering flood elevations and reducing peak flows when site conditions allow doing so. <br />Floodproofing is also seen as a viable alternative when it’s economically feasible, and volume control <br />potentially can reduce smaller-scale flood flows when it can be implemented effectively on a large enough <br />scale. Factors such as adverse downstream impacts and their mitigation costs will be considered during <br />the comprehensive analysis. <br />It is likely a combination of project types will be recommended during the Phase 2 analysis to address the <br />local and regional flooding issues and meet the defined goals and objectives in Section 2. The project <br />types recommended in Phase 2 will depend on a flood prone area’s site constraints such as location, land <br />availability, soils, sensitivity of downstream areas and the ability of regional approaches to effectively <br />address issues. <br />80