Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION SERVICE AREA VISION PARK PLANS IMPLEMENTATIONPLANNING PROCESS <br />EAST OF THE RIVER PARK MASTER PLAN <br />OPERATIONS AND <br />MAINTENANCE <br />The high amount of community engagement events, the Youth <br />Design Team, the Data Jam, Design Week, and the Plan Van <br />were all done in an effort to ensure that the planning process <br />was open and equitable, and to perform work in the spirit <br />of a racial equity lens. Community engagement unfolded in <br />three main phases, in concert with the gradual evolution of <br />park plans over 19 months (for a detailed list of engagement <br />events, see Appendix A). While there is always room for <br />improvement, and we always learn how to improve our work <br />with every planning process, we can confidently say that the <br />extensive engagement associated with the East of the River <br />Park Master Plan garnered input and dialog from a broad <br />cross-section of the community. The planning team worked <br />hard to reach the broader community in the effort and was <br />supported by local media in getting the word out through <br />evening news coverage and almost monthly articles in local <br />and neighborhood papers. The ERPMP is the result of input <br />that spans ranges of age, gender, economic status, race and <br />ethnicity, and historic involvement with park planning. <br />Most important, the planning process and park designs <br />changed over the course of the project in response to the <br />community’s voice. The ERPMP process unfolded slowly and <br />deliberately over more than a year and a half, repeatedly <br />asking the community to weigh in at each stage: at the initial <br />visioning, on the community engagement data themselves, <br />on early hand-sketched designs, at the stage of design <br />refinement, and even on this very document, which will <br />doubtlessly change between this draft and the final adopted <br />version. <br />Though a park planning process cannot solve the deeply <br />entrenched institutional bias that exists throughout <br />government systems, it can recognize that such bias does <br />exist. It can do its part to make decisions that set the stage <br />for eliminating that bias in areas where MPRB has jurisdiction. <br />MPRB recognizes the importance of the commitment to the <br />ERPMP process many community members have made— <br />especially at a time of heightened tension and dialog around <br />race—and the agency is indebted for that service. <br />The ERPMP is a significant step forward in ensuring that racial <br />and other bias is eliminated. It envisions a neighborhood park <br />system that meets the needs of the changing community. It <br />aligns park plans with community needs and invests in areas <br />where those needs are greatest. It does not assume the parks <br />will be remade just as they are now. It remakes the parks in <br />the image of the new present and future Minneapolis. <br />Image 13 | Toole Design Group presents at Community Advisory Committee meeting on design for accessibility. Source: MPRB <br />24