Laserfiche WebLink
included in the summer newsletter article, but is more specific to actual applicants rather <br />than the general newsletter reader. <br /> <br />The second proposed change is to the fee structure. As noted, the current fee is $250, <br />with the escrow reserved for review costs beyond the fixed expenses that the City <br />incurs in processing these applications. Those expenses include internal staff review <br />for completeness, advertising notice in the St. Anthony Bulletin, preparing and mailing <br />notices to all property owners within 350 feet of the applicant’s property, and various <br />clerical costs in establishing and tracking the permitting process – as well as the public <br />meeting expenses that result from the application. <br /> <br />Review costs from the City’s consulting planner, engineer, and attorney, when required, <br />are commonly applied from the escrow. Many applicants misapprehend the purpose of <br />the escrow, and are surprised when after the City Council has taken action, there is little <br />escrow remaining – instead thinking that the escrow serves as a sort of “damage <br />deposit” which they expect to have returned in majority or in whole. <br /> <br />Another common misunderstanding is the relationship between an application and the <br />applicant’s expectations. Many property owners mistakenly believe that the mere act of <br />application will result in approval – a belief that staff works hard to dispel, particularly <br />when an application is at or near the edges of the City’s land use policies. <br /> <br />To manage these expectations, staff is suggesting a change to the structure by <br />increasing the fee portion of the application, from $250 to $500 at this time, and perhaps <br />an additional increment at the City’s yearly fee ordinance review. The review costs are <br />almost always more than this, and it is believed that this change will help to clarify the <br />real costs of review for an applicant’s request. <br /> <br />As with any such proposal, the clearer and more complete the set of application <br />materials, the more likely it is that review costs can be kept to the minimum. Further, <br />while applicants tend to believe that their particular project is the most reasonable and <br />certain, staff works hard to caution applicants that no outcome is certain – and indeed, <br />sometimes unlikely - and the costs of application can be high. <br /> <br />The attached draft cover letter, combined with the changes to fee and escrow, are <br />intended to help potential applicants think carefully about their request, and increase <br />understanding when the do decide to apply. Comments and questions at the workshop <br />are welcomed. <br />