My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PK PACKET 04142003
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Parks and Environmental Commission Packets
>
2003
>
PK PACKET 04142003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2019 3:18:30 PM
Creation date
8/6/2019 3:18:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes <br />March 10, 2003 <br />Page 11 <br />1 <br />2 Chair Jindra referenced the Council meeting at Silver Point Park and reviewed Mr. Hubmer's <br />3 concerns regarding the position of shelter at Silver Point. She noted the cost of the project <br />4 stating that they are not getting what they paid for. She stated that City Council does not see <br />5 how frustrating the process has been noting that it is frustrating to work with people who are not <br />6 competent in their jobs. She expressed concerns and frustration with the firms hired by the City <br />7 adding that the Commission did ask the City not to use URS again. She stated that the school <br />8 and the residents are very unhappy that they still cannot use the park. She referenced the number <br />9 of date extensions stating that this is totally unacceptable. Public Works Director Hartman <br />10 clarified the process the City takes with contracts and acknowledged the Commissioners <br />11 frustrations. <br />12 <br />13 Chair Jindra suggested that the City of St. Anthony review the quality of the consultants that are <br />14 being hired. She stated that they should improve the quality to match the cost. Mr. Zurbey <br />15 agreed stating that accountability of the consultant is also an issue. <br />16 <br />17 Mr. Anderson asked what the Commission to clarify their expectations from his meetings and <br />18 discussions with the consultants. Commissioner Wagner explained that the Commission should <br />19 know what is included in the additional costs and what can they get out of it. Mr. Anderson <br />20 stated that he does not think they would get anything more than the $2800. Public Works <br />Director Hartman agreed stating that the expectation is to come in at or under budget. He stated <br />that they need a better explanation of the content of costs. <br />23 <br />24 Chair Jindra asked him to call and get as much clarification as possible. She stated that the <br />25 Commission wants as much clarification as possible for the additional $15,000 for re -grading. <br />26 Mr. Anderson stated that they have already explained the content noting that if they can get it <br />27 done within the present budget that they should get it done. He stated that this would stop the <br />28 project and strongly suggested that they avoid halting the project. <br />29 <br />30 V. REPORTS. <br />31 <br />32 A. Community Services. <br />33 <br />34 Diane Skrivseth provided the Commission with an update on the 2003 Community Services <br />35 Budget. She stated that there would probably be drastic changes in the Community Services <br />36 Department noting that they do not know the changes at this time. <br />37 <br />38 B. School Board. <br />39 <br />40 Denise Dunn was absent due to illness. <br />41 <br />42 C. Sports Boosters. <br />z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.