Laserfiche WebLink
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes <br />March 13, 2006 <br />Page 2 <br />2 Director of Public Works Hartman asked if they had any funding sources or cost estimates. Mr. <br />3 Urdahl noted cost estimates have been coming in for the dugouts and for each of those structures, <br />4 it would be approximately $5,000. In terms of funding, he hoped both softballs and fundraising <br />5 groups could contribute at some level. He indicated they had also recently submitted a grant to <br />6 the Minnesota Twins for a $5,000 matching grant, as well as anticipating the school giving a <br />7 donation. <br />9 Director of Public Works Hartman asked what their intended schedule was. Mr. Urdahl <br />10 responded it would depend on funding, but they anticipated it could be August. He noted the <br />11 purpose of him coming to the Commission tonight was to show the plans, address the problem, <br />12 and get some input from the Commission. <br />13 <br />14 Chair Koehntop stated their next meeting was June 12 and asked if he would have further <br />15 information at that time. Mr. Urdahl stated if the Commission had no issues with the plans, then <br />16 he would work with Mr. Hartman on this project. <br />17 <br />18 Commissioner Sholl noted there is a huge issue with foul balls and he liked the idea of dugouts. <br />19 <br />20 V. PRESENTATION ON EMERALD PARK/JEAN M. GARBARINI, CLOSE LANDSCAPE <br />1 TO PRESENT. <br />/2 <br />23 Jean Garbarini, Close Landscape, stated she has been working on the plans for Emerald Park. <br />24 She presented the concept plan she designed for Emerald Park. She indicated the plan showed a <br />25 new facility/building as well as addressed all of the previous concerns. <br />26 <br />27 Commissioner Ganley asked if there room for a football field in the park also. Ms. Garbarini <br />28 noted she would look at that as an option. <br />29 <br />30 Ms. Garbarini indicated they had looked at all of the resident's comments and put them into this <br />31 plan, but this was a starting point and it did not mean they needed to raise all of the money to do <br />32 everything. She indicated one thing that could be cut was the splash deck and the separate picnic <br />33 shelter. She noted the park had a history of having a water feature, but she knew they had a <br />34 significant water feature at Central Park and she was not sure if they wanted one at this park, <br />35 even though the residents were enthusiastic about one. <br />36 <br />37 Commissioner Sholl asked what type of a surface would be from the warming house to the <br />38 hockey rink. Ms. Garbarini replied right now they were not showing anything and this would <br />39 have to be something to look at. <br />40 <br />41 Chair Koehntop noted right now they needed to wait for the City Council to tell them how much <br />42 of a budget they had to work with. <br />i 3 <br />44 Mr. Doug _, 4009 Shamrock Drive, stated they thought the price was on the high side. He <br />