My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 12102019
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2019
>
CC PACKET 12102019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2019 9:06:43 AM
Creation date
12/5/2019 3:55:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2. Analysis <br /> <br />Final Planned Unit Development <br /> <br />Purpose. The applicant wishes to amend the previously approved Silver Lake Village PUD, <br />Planned Unit Development (presently applicable to the site) to accommodate the proposed <br />apartment project. In consideration of PUD applications, it is important that the purpose of <br />planned unit development be considered and that a determination be made that such <br />purpose will be fulfilled. <br /> <br />Existing PUD. Originally approved in 2004, the existing PUD overlays more than 60 acres of <br />land. In this regard, the 13-acre Walmart site is a component of a larger PUD site which <br />includes several surrounding commercial and multi-family residential buildings. The project <br />amendment under consideration only encompasses the 13-acre Walmart and Salo <br />park/pond site. Other existing PUD sites/uses are to remain in place and no modifications <br />are proposed. <br /> <br />Processing. To accommodate the requested PUD amendment, a two-stage review process <br />is required. The application under consideration now is the Final PUD Plan stage. The <br />review standard for Final PUD is whether the proposed Final Plan complies with the terms <br />and conditions of the Preliminary Plan approval. <br /> <br />The Preliminary Plan PUD approval was adopted by the City Council on September 10th, <br />2019. That approval incorporated the following conditions of approval from the staff and <br />Planning Commission recommendations (with additional staff comments provided where <br />applicable): <br /> <br />1. An access easement shall be in place to accommodate the northerly access to the <br />subject site. Proof of such access easement shall be provided to the City as a part <br />of the original or amended PUD documentation. (This easement should be verified <br />prior to construction.) <br /> <br />2. Access-related issues shall be subject to comment and recommendation by the <br />City Engineer. (The City Engineer will review all plans as a part of the Construction <br />Plan and permitting processes.) <br /> <br />3. As a part of the Final PUD Plan submission, a plan of the enclosed parking area <br />shall be submitted for City review. (submitted with the Final Plan PUD set.) <br /> <br />4. The City finds that the proposed parking supply (and the deficit based on <br />ordinance requirements) is adequate to serve the facility. The City will continue to <br />research the parking demand to determine whether a lesser parking supply can <br />properly serve the project in an effort to reduce impervious surface coverage on the <br />property. (As noted, the applicants have reduced parking supply from the <br />42
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.