Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />of the implementation actions following final ratification of the 2040 Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br /> <br />• PUD Flexibility – Density. The proposed senior apartment building is 125 units, on 4 <br />acres – a density of approximately 30 units per acre. The City’s Comprehensive Plan <br />allows for projects of up to 40 units per acre, while the R-4 Zoning District would <br />accommodate just 25 units per acre without PUD flexibility. The R-4 District is used as a <br />comparison district for purposes of establishing the baseline zoning requirements as it <br />would be the zoning district applied if PUD were not being pursued. <br /> <br />• PUD Flexibility – Joint Access. One of the aspects of PUD flexibility being sought in this <br />design is the shared access and travel route from Kenzie Terrace on the south boundary <br />of the Urban Grove property. This private drive is shown to provide access to the <br />parking and service portions of the Senior Residential building, as well as to the Urban <br />Grove private streets and proposed garage buildings. The plans do not, at this stage, <br />illustrate the subdivision and property line between the two development sites. As a <br />part of the project, a subdivision plat will be necessary, and the two projects will need to <br />incorporate shared access and maintenance agreements covering the use and upkeep of <br />that private access drive. <br /> <br />Staff has noted to the developers that a project which accomplishes several other goals <br />– such as affordable housing, various design and/or architectural elements could be <br />factors in consideration of the PUD approach being sought for this project. It is staff’s <br />understanding, based on early discussions with the applicants, that TIF assistance will be <br />requested as a part of the project. The details and scope of that request is not a subject <br />of the planning review, but will be important to understand early on in the project <br />discussions. Public financing consideration should parallel the zoning review. <br /> <br />• Site Plan – Apartment Development. <br />o Setbacks. The plan shows setbacks for the proposed building of approximately <br />80 feet from Stinson, approximately 70 feet from the south common property <br />line with Bremer Bank, and more than 150 feet from the north line, which is an <br />alley serving single family homes along 27th Avenue NE. <br />o Impervious Surface. The concept plan does not provide an impervious surface <br />coverage estimate. The R-4 standard would be 50%. Given stormwater issues in <br />this area of the community, the applicants should plan to stay well under the <br />50% impervious threshold. <br />o Parking. The site plan shows surface parking on the west (Stinson) side of the <br />building of approximately 50 spaces, and an addition 22 spaces on the east side <br />of the building, presumably for staff. Underground parking is also planned, <br />