My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSESSION 01212020
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2020
>
CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSESSION 01212020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 3:48:00 PM
Creation date
1/14/2020 3:46:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />however, total quantities are not indicated. The Zoning Ordinance requires 1 <br />space per 3 units for “retirement homes”, which would mandate at least 42 <br />spaces. Given the mixed nature of the units (independent living, assisted living, <br />and memory care, a ratio of approximately one space per unit should be <br />preserved. <br />o Access. The proposed plan utilized the existing access point to Stinson, and the <br />referenced shared access to Kenzie Terrace. The Stinson Parkway access would <br />be used for access to the main parking area and entrance, as well as to the <br />parking garage on the south end of the building. Given the Minneapolis Park <br />Board’s concerns over use and traffic on the Parkway, consideration should be <br />given to providing garage access from the internal private street shared with <br />Urban Grove, rather than the front parking area from Stinson. <br /> <br />• Other Considerations <br />o The applicants have designed the surface parking in the front of the building to <br />accommodate a band of landscaping along the Stinson Parkway trail, as well as <br />additional front yard green planting area. The setback of the building from <br />Stinson accommodates this space. Staff’s recommendations include avoidance <br />on long “dead-end” drive/parking areas where visitors would have difficulty <br />turning around when the parking is full. <br />o The access and “dead-end” traffic pattern would typically also apply to <br />emergency vehicle access in these areas as well. An apparent emergency vehicle <br />egress lane is shown to the north of the front drive. The City’s public safety staff <br />will comment on these issues further as the project goes forward. <br />o Architecturally, the building is proposed to be a 4-story structure with a flat roof. <br />The concept plans show a series of articulated roof line parapet extensions. The <br />building wall is a combination of recessed and forward extended sections, with <br />balconies either recessed or extending outward, depending on the building wall <br />section. Materials are not specified at this stage. <br />For processing and next-step purposes, the applicants would seek a “Preliminary Plan” PUD <br />request, with more fully detailed plans and support materials. To advance to that stage, the <br />Planning Commission and City Council can use this Concept discussion to identify preferences in <br />project density, location, site planning, and architecture, along with any other relevant issues, <br />such as affordability and sustainability, that would be important for the applicants to <br />incorporate into their next-stage plans. <br />As noted previously, clarity as to financial considerations should also be included as a part of <br />the discussion. It will be important that planning and zoning aspects of the City’s review do not <br />advance too far beyond the expectations for financial assistance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.